PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF PONKAN MANDARIN APPLIED TO GRADING MACHINE | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 28, Volume 26, Issue 2, April 2009, Page 1036-1053 PDF (399.38 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2009.109768 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| I. Yehia1; M. H. Kabeel1; M. M. Abdel Galeel2 | ||||
| 1Senior Res., Ag. Eng. Res. Inst., Egypt. | ||||
| 2Res., Ag. Eng. Res. Inst., Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The aim of this research is to study some physical and mechanical properties of Ponkan mandarin, as promising fruits, to help the design of handling machines. The physical and mechanical properties are incorporated in the development of the grading machine as a case study. The main results in this study can be summarized in the following points: Physical properties of Ponkan mandarin fruits: diameter = 58.61 – 85.56 mm, height = 49.45 – 78.9 mm, mass = 70 - 128 g, volume = 60 - 120 cm3, projected area = 41.22 – 81.88 cm2, peel thickness = 2.18 – 3.73 mm, peel mass = 24.2 – 36.1 g, number of segments/fruit = 8 - 12, number of seeds/fruit = 4 - 9, juice volume/fruit = 23 - 34 cm3, and juice volume/fruit mass = 0.24 - 0.45 L/kg. Mechanical properties of Ponkan mandarin: The average of firmness distribution along Ponkan mandarin surface were: the maximum = 18.3 N/cm2 at the top of fruit and the minimum = 11 N/cm2 at the bottom of fruit. The deformation range increased from 2.75 - 3.09 to 8.52 - 10.02 mm by increasing loading from 1 to 5 kg. Meanwhile, the deformation range increased from 2.75 - 8.52 to 3.09 - 10.02 by increasing loading time from 15 to 60 s. Some application to grading machine is given also in the paper as a case study. | ||||
| References | ||||
|
ِAgamia, E. H.; Nageib, M. M. and Tamahy, M. M., 1982, Evaluation of six varieties of mandarin, Nat. Res. Cen, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt, Annals of Ag. Sc., Moshtohor, 18: 225 - 233.
Atta-Aly, M. A. and Awady, M. N., 1994, Safety and accuracy of a non-destructive deformation tester manufactured in Egypt for measure tomato fruit firmness, Annals Agric. Sci., Ain Shams Univ., 39(1): 307-318.
Awady, M. N.; Yehia, I. Hassan, M. A. and El Lithy, A. M., 2004, Some physical and mechanical properties of Minneola fruits, Misr J. Ag. Eng., 21(2): 669-684.
Buyanov, A. I. And Voronyuk, B. A., 1985, Physical and mechanical properties of plants, Fertilizers and Soils, Amerind Pub. Co., PVT, LTD, New Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta, New York: 15 - 97.
H. R. I. (Hort. Res. Inst.), 2004, Data on citrus statistics, Oral communication with Prof. Dr. Latif, Sen, Res., Citrus Div., Hort. Res. Inst. (H. R. I.), ARC.
Kinawy, A. H., 1995, A comparative study on two mandarin cultivars, M. Sc., Hort. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Al-Azhar U.: 1 - 168.
Khanali, M., Varnamkhasti, M. G., Tabatabaeefar, A. and Mobli, H., 2007, Mass and volume modeling of tangerine (Citrus reticulate) fruit with some physical attributes, Int. Agrophysics, Iran, 21: 329-334.
Mohsenin, N. N., 1986, Physical properties of plant and animal materials, Gordon and Breach Sc. Pub., N. Y.
Mousa, M. M., 1998, Engineering factors affecting the development of grading machine for citrus, Ph. D., Fac. of Ag., Cairo U.: 126-255.
Peleg K., 1985. Produce Handling, Packaging and Distribution, linear form: AVI Publ. Comp. Inc., Westport, Co., USA.
Sharawy, A. M., 1992, A compartive study of some citrus species and varities grown in Egypt and Sudan and the effect of environmental factors on the quality of fruits and yeild, M. Sc., Sc. In African Stud. Inst., Cairo U.: 25 - 94.
Saunt, J., 1990, Citrus varities of the world, Sinclair Int. Ltd., Norwich, England: 49 - 61.
Yehia, I., 2001, Design and construction of an automatic orange-juice extraction system, 9th Conf. of Misr Soc. of Ag. 9-11 Sept.: 147-162. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 316 PDF Download: 288 |
||||
