A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic and Open Modified Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer
Saleh, A., Gharib, M., Amin, A., Abd El Kader, A., Aboelfath, A. (2023). A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic and Open Modified Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer. EKB Journal Management System, 29(1), 1-8. doi: 10.21608/zumj.2020.48217.1992
Abdel Moneim Abdel Aziz Saleh; Mahmoud Ahmed Gharib; Abdelaziz Ibrahim Amin; Ahmed Mohamed Abd El Kader; Amr Mostafa Aboelfath. "A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic and Open Modified Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer". EKB Journal Management System, 29, 1, 2023, 1-8. doi: 10.21608/zumj.2020.48217.1992
Saleh, A., Gharib, M., Amin, A., Abd El Kader, A., Aboelfath, A. (2023). 'A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic and Open Modified Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer', EKB Journal Management System, 29(1), pp. 1-8. doi: 10.21608/zumj.2020.48217.1992
Saleh, A., Gharib, M., Amin, A., Abd El Kader, A., Aboelfath, A. A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic and Open Modified Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer. EKB Journal Management System, 2023; 29(1): 1-8. doi: 10.21608/zumj.2020.48217.1992

A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic and Open Modified Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer

Zagazig University Medical Journal
Article 1, Volume 29, Issue 1, January 2023, Page 1-8  XML PDF (316.78 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2020.48217.1992
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Abdel Moneim Abdel Aziz Saleh1; Mahmoud Ahmed Gharib1; Abdelaziz Ibrahim Amin2; Ahmed Mohamed Abd El Kader1; Amr Mostafa Aboelfath email 1
1Gynecology & Obstetrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
2Gynecology &Obstetrics Department,Faculty of Medicine,Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Radical hysterectomy is the standard surgical approach for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. The debate still exists whether laparoscopic or open surgery is the best. This study aimed to compare the feasibility, the intra-operative and immediate postoperative outcomes in patients who undergo modified open radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer.
Methods: A prospective comparative trial included 34 patients with early stage cervical cancer stage IA2 to IIA, divided to two equal groups 17 patient each; group (A) underwent open radical hysterectomy and group (B) underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Results: Mean operation time was longer in group B (268.52±41.9 min vs. 200.35±57.55 min), Blood loss and HB defect were significantly higher in group A (521.76±152.7 ml vs. 274.0±61.05 ml), and (1.87±0.58 gm/dl vs. 0.82±0.27 gm/dl). Hospital stay and Pain score were significantly longer in group A than B, also intra-operative complications; were significantly higher in group A.
Conclusion: Conventional open radical hysterectomy has shorter operative time than laparoscopic hysterectomy but with more intraoperative and immediate post-operative complications.
Keywords: Radical Hysterectomy; Early Stage; Cervical Cancer; Laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Keywords
Radical Hysterectomy; Early Stage; Cervical Cancer; Laparoscopic hysterectomy
Statistics
Article View: 334
PDF Download: 185