Surgical Intervention versus Endoscopy in the Treatment of Bile Duct Stones
Alshaalan, A., Arafsha, F., Othman, M., Sindi, B., Sanai, E., Alwabisi, M., Dumyati, M., Alsinnari, M., Halawani, A., Alahmed, A., Alharbi, D., Algharbi, A., Al-Jabri, L., Alshabrawi, F., Alkhadrawi, H., Niyazi, R. (2017). Surgical Intervention versus Endoscopy in the Treatment of Bile Duct Stones. EKB Journal Management System, 68(1), 829-836. doi: 10.12816/0038181
Ahmed Marwan Alshaalan; Forsan Hani Arafsha; Mohammed Abdulaziz Othman; Basam Zuhaer Sindi; Eisa Adil Sanai; Mohammed Hamdan Alwabisi; Mohammed Saleh Dumyati; Mahir Mazin Alsinnari; Abdulghaffar Talal Halawani; Ali Malik Alahmed; Dalal Aayed Alharbi; Abrar Mubarak Algharbi; Louai Ahmad Zakwan Al-Jabri; Faisal Adnan Alshabrawi; Hussain Mahfood Alkhadrawi; Rayan Abdulshakur Niyazi. "Surgical Intervention versus Endoscopy in the Treatment of Bile Duct Stones". EKB Journal Management System, 68, 1, 2017, 829-836. doi: 10.12816/0038181
Alshaalan, A., Arafsha, F., Othman, M., Sindi, B., Sanai, E., Alwabisi, M., Dumyati, M., Alsinnari, M., Halawani, A., Alahmed, A., Alharbi, D., Algharbi, A., Al-Jabri, L., Alshabrawi, F., Alkhadrawi, H., Niyazi, R. (2017). 'Surgical Intervention versus Endoscopy in the Treatment of Bile Duct Stones', EKB Journal Management System, 68(1), pp. 829-836. doi: 10.12816/0038181
Alshaalan, A., Arafsha, F., Othman, M., Sindi, B., Sanai, E., Alwabisi, M., Dumyati, M., Alsinnari, M., Halawani, A., Alahmed, A., Alharbi, D., Algharbi, A., Al-Jabri, L., Alshabrawi, F., Alkhadrawi, H., Niyazi, R. Surgical Intervention versus Endoscopy in the Treatment of Bile Duct Stones. EKB Journal Management System, 2017; 68(1): 829-836. doi: 10.12816/0038181

Surgical Intervention versus Endoscopy in the Treatment of Bile Duct Stones

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
Article 4, Volume 68, Issue 1, July 2017, Page 829-836  XML PDF (385.94 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.12816/0038181
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ahmed Marwan Alshaalan email 1; Forsan Hani Arafsha2; Mohammed Abdulaziz Othman3; Basam Zuhaer Sindi4; Eisa Adil Sanai2; Mohammed Hamdan Alwabisi5; Mohammed Saleh Dumyati4; Mahir Mazin Alsinnari4; Abdulghaffar Talal Halawani4; Ali Malik Alahmed6; Dalal Aayed Alharbi2; Abrar Mubarak Algharbi7; Louai Ahmad Zakwan Al-Jabri8; Faisal Adnan Alshabrawi2; Hussain Mahfood Alkhadrawi6; Rayan Abdulshakur Niyazi4
1Ibn Sina National College
2Battarjee Medical College
3Mohammed Hamdan Alwabisi
4Umm alqura university
5King Abdulaziz University
6University of Dammam
7Almaarefa colleges
8Forsan Hani Arafsha
Abstract
   Bile duct stones (BDSs) may happen in up to 4%–15% of all patients for whom cholecystectomy is performed. Patients giving CBDS have manifestations including: biliary colic, jaundice, cholangitis, pancreatitis or might be asymptomatic. It is critical to recognize essential and auxiliary stones, in light of the fact that the treatment approach shifts. Stones found some time recently, amid, and after cholecystectomy had likewise contrasting medicines. Distinctive strategies have been utilized for the treatment of CBDS yet the appropriate treatment relies on upon conditions, for example, quiet' fulfilment, number and size of stones, and the specialists involvement in laparoscopy. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with or without endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, laparoscopic CBD investigation (transcystic or transcholedochal), or laparotomy with CBD investigation (by T-tube, C-tube inclusion, or essential conclusion) are the most regularly utilized strategies overseeing CBDS (Common bile duct stones). We will survey the pathophysiology of bile duct stones, finding, and distinctive procedures of treatment with particular concentrate on the different surgical modalities
Statistics
Article View: 251
PDF Download: 363