Clinical and biochemical analysis for the adjunctive effects of simvastatin and metformin in the treatment of chronic periodontitis patients | ||||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 17, Volume 67, Issue 1 - January (Oral Medicine, X-Ray, Oral Biology & Oral Pathology) - Serial Number 3, January 2021, Page 465-474 PDF (889.31 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2021.51706.1372 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Asem Kamel 1; Hany Gobran 2; Ahmed Abdelrahman3; Ahmed Hussein  4
| ||||
| 1Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Dental Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University (Assiut Branch), Assiut, Egypt | ||||
| 2Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University (Boys Branch), Egypt | ||||
| 3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University (Assiut Branch), Assiut, Egypt | ||||
| 4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background: adjunctive local periodontal therapy is one of the best options to improve the health of the pocket tissue. The comparison of local effects of simvastatin and metformin as aid in enhance the healing of periodontal tissue is the point of importance. Methods: a total of 45 systemically healthy patients with mild to moderate chronic periodontitis; which having a generalized pocket depth varied from 3mm to 5mm. All patients handled by scaling and root planning and divided haphazardly into: group I, as a control group (n= 15), in which the patients treated by application of placebo gel; group II, (n= 15) treated with application 1.2% simvastatin gel; group III, (n= 15), treated with application of 1% metformin gel. Clinical and biochemical criteria were collected at threshold 3, 6 and 9 months. Results: an advancement in both plaque and gingival indexes was noticed in total 3 groups at 6 and 9 months. Plaque index and gingival index showed decrement in group II and III than group I. The cutback in probing depth and clinical attachment loss was higher in the group III than other groups. Significant minimization in both IL-6 and TNF-α levels occurred from baseline to the end of measurement duration in all groups. Clear interaction was established amid IL-6 and TNF-α heights. Conclusion: metformin was comparatively better than simvastatin in respect of clinical and biochemical markers. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Simvastatin; Metformin; Periodontitis; Adjunctive therapy; IL-6 | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 386 PDF Download: 452 |
||||
