الموتة الدماغية بين الأحکام الفقهية والمستجدات الطبية دراسة مقارنة

عنوان المقالة [English]

Brain death between jurisprudence rulings and medical developments, a comparative study .

المؤلفون [English]

Dr. Ibrahim Mohamed Abdel Sami .

المستخلص [English]

Abstract:

Research plan: includes an introduction, four sections, and a conclusion. Introduction: It includes the reasons for choosing the topic, previous studies, research methodology, and research plan.

The first topic - the concept of death and its signs from the legal and medical perspectives, and it has two demands:

The first requirement: the concept of death in the language and legal and medical terminology.

The second requirement: the signs of death according to jurists and doctors.

The second topic - in brain death, its concept and causes, and has two demands: The first requirement: the concept of brain death, and its history.

The second requirement: the components of the brain, the causes of its death, and the steps for diagnosing brain death.

The third topic - the medical and jurisprudential position on brain death, and it contains three demands:

The first requirement: the medical position on brain death.

The second requirement: the jurisprudential position on brain death.

The third requirement: resuscitation devices and the ruling on stopping them from the brain-dead.

The fourth topic - the implications of ruling whether or not the brain is dead. Conclusion: It includes the most important results.

الکلمات الرئيسية [English]

(Jurisprudence rulings) (brain death) (signs of death) (components of the brain) (contemporary medicine) .