STUDIES ON DETECTION, DIAGNOSIS AND CONTROL OF LEGIONELLA PNEUMOPHILA IN DIFFERENT WATER SAMPLES | ||||
Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences | ||||
Article 4, Volume 14, Issue 2, September 2006, Page 593-611 PDF (1.01 MB) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/ajs.2006.15304 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Mansour F.A.* 1; S.A. El-Sherbiny2; N.A. El-Morsy3 | ||||
1Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt | ||||
2Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt | ||||
3Digestive System Center, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
A number of 192 samples (180 water & swab specimens and 12 patient sputa) were chosen from different sites of Mansoura University Hospitals for detection and diagnosis of Legionella pneumophila. Out of the 192 samples, 148 were positive by culture method and non-specific staining technique such as gram staining and biochemical analysis. In our trials for diagnosis of Legionella pneumophila, we found that 107 of 148 samples were positive by slide agglutination test and 110 samples were positive by direct immunoflourescence assay, while 130 samples were positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique which proved to be the most specific and sensitive technique for diagnostic investigation of L. pneumophila. The results show that the four disinfectant procedures (chlorine, ozone, U.V. light and heat) were effective in eradicating Legionella pneumophila from different water samples. Both UV light and heat (60ºC) produced a 5 log kill in less than 1 h. In contrast, both chlorine and ozone required 5 h of exposure to produce a 5 log decrease. Neither turbidity nor the higher temperature of 43ºC impaired the efficacy of any of the disinfectant methods. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Sputa; Legionella pneumophila; U.V. light; disinfectants; Immunoflourescence assay | ||||
Supplementary Files
|
||||
Statistics Article View: 173 PDF Download: 295 |
||||