A comparative SEM assessment for the ability of PIPS, XP-Finisher and PUI to eliminate smear layer and open dentinal tubules
Obeid, M., elshaboury, E., obeid, R. (2022). A comparative SEM assessment for the ability of PIPS, XP-Finisher and PUI to eliminate smear layer and open dentinal tubules. EKB Journal Management System, 68(2), 1937-1943. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.117395.1956
maram Obeid; elham elshaboury; raneem obeid. "A comparative SEM assessment for the ability of PIPS, XP-Finisher and PUI to eliminate smear layer and open dentinal tubules". EKB Journal Management System, 68, 2, 2022, 1937-1943. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.117395.1956
Obeid, M., elshaboury, E., obeid, R. (2022). 'A comparative SEM assessment for the ability of PIPS, XP-Finisher and PUI to eliminate smear layer and open dentinal tubules', EKB Journal Management System, 68(2), pp. 1937-1943. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.117395.1956
Obeid, M., elshaboury, E., obeid, R. A comparative SEM assessment for the ability of PIPS, XP-Finisher and PUI to eliminate smear layer and open dentinal tubules. EKB Journal Management System, 2022; 68(2): 1937-1943. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.117395.1956

A comparative SEM assessment for the ability of PIPS, XP-Finisher and PUI to eliminate smear layer and open dentinal tubules

Egyptian Dental Journal
Article 18, Volume 68, Issue 2 - Serial Number 5, April 2022, Page 1937-1943  XML PDF (982.33 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2022.117395.1956
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
maram Obeid email orcid 1; elham elshabouryorcid 2; raneem obeidorcid 3
1Associate Professor, Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
2Associate Professor, Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Modern science and arts – MSA Egypt.
3Associate Professor of Oral Biology, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Future University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to assess the removal of smear layer from the dentinal surfaces after canal cleaning and irrigants activation with different systems (Conventional needle irrigation, PUI, PIPS, XP-Finisher).
Methodology: Seventy human single rooted maxillary incisors were instrumented up to X5 (50/6) Protaper Next rotary system. The irrigation activation was performed using either: PIPS, PUI, XP-Finisher, or conventional irrigation. Samples were cut lengthwise, then examined under a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed with Kruskal- Wallis test. Significant difference between the groups was recorded statistically in the total scores of the smear layer on dentinal wall (P<0.05).
Results: PIPS and XP-Finisher groups showed more smear layer removal than the conventional and PUI groups and this was statistically significant (P<0.05). This was clearly presented by opened dentinal tubules in photomicrograph of SEM.
Conclusion: With the constraints of this in vitro study, PIPS and XP-Finisher are better in eliminating smear layer from dentinal walls.
Keywords
PIPS; PUI; XP-Finisher; irrigation; SEM
Statistics
Article View: 366
PDF Download: 282