Composite Grafts as an Alternative Conduit to Prosthetic Grafts in Below Knee Femoro-popliteal Bypass in Patients of Chronic Lower Limb Ischemia | ||||
Ain Shams Journal of Surgery | ||||
Volume 15, Issue 2, July 2022, Page 88-95 PDF (749.26 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/asjs.2022.246347 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Hassan Lofty Ibrahim; Ahmed Raafat Naga; Karim Amr Ghazy; Sameh Moustafa Elsayed | ||||
Department of Surgery, Vascular Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Background: Chronic limb threatening lower limb ischaemia (CLTI) gives high limb loss and mortality. Infragenicular Femoro-popliteal bypass offers in-line flow to target vessels. When vein not available, composite and prosthetic grafts are used. Aim of the work: Comparing composite vs synthetic femoro-popliteal bypass conduits in treatment of CLTI. Patients and methods: 20 adult patients were included in this prospective study from July 2020 to July 2021 having CLTI requiring below knee femoro-popliteal bypass, no suitable vein conduit. Ten had composite grafts bypass (group A) and 10 patients had synthetic graft (group B), and followed for 6 months. Results: Improved clinical manifestations in both groups and significant increase of ankle brachial index. 6 months 1ry and 2ry patency were 90% and 100% in group A, and 67% and 78% in group B. Limb salvage were 100% in group A and 89% in group B. No significant difference between groups’ outcome, complications, and ABI. Conclusion: Both types of conduit showed acceptable feasibility and outcome. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Infragenicular bypass; femoro-popliteal; composite graft; synthetic graft | ||||
Statistics Article View: 260 PDF Download: 268 |
||||