Comparison Between Blind And Ultrasound Guided Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion In Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Control Study
El-Shaarawy, A., Moselhy, M., Nour El-Din, D. (2022). Comparison Between Blind And Ultrasound Guided Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion In Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Control Study. EKB Journal Management System, 3(3), 182-195. doi: 10.21608/ejmr.2022.259003
Ahmed Mostafa El-Shaarawy; Mohamed Abdelrahman Moselhy; Dina Mohamed Nour El-Din. "Comparison Between Blind And Ultrasound Guided Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion In Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Control Study". EKB Journal Management System, 3, 3, 2022, 182-195. doi: 10.21608/ejmr.2022.259003
El-Shaarawy, A., Moselhy, M., Nour El-Din, D. (2022). 'Comparison Between Blind And Ultrasound Guided Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion In Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Control Study', EKB Journal Management System, 3(3), pp. 182-195. doi: 10.21608/ejmr.2022.259003
El-Shaarawy, A., Moselhy, M., Nour El-Din, D. Comparison Between Blind And Ultrasound Guided Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion In Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Control Study. EKB Journal Management System, 2022; 3(3): 182-195. doi: 10.21608/ejmr.2022.259003

Comparison Between Blind And Ultrasound Guided Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion In Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Control Study

Egyptian Journal of Medical Research
Volume 3, Issue 3, July 2022, Page 182-195  XML PDF (570.94 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejmr.2022.259003
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ahmed Mostafa El-Shaarawy; Mohamed Abdelrahman Moselhy; Dina Mohamed Nour El-Din
Anesthesiology, Surgical ICU and Pain Department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Egypt
Abstract
The goal of this study is to compare between the blind technique and US guided technique in insertion of the LMA and confirming its position. A 102 patients who underwent elective surgery were randomly selected and grouped into 2 groups, 51 in each group. Group B: using the blind technique in positioning of the LMA and confirming its position by the fiberoptic score and group U: using the US in positioning the LMA and confirming its position by the fiberoptic score The laryngeal mask insertion time for 1st group was significantly shorter than that for the 2nd group. The fiberoptic glottic view scores for 2nd group was significantly better than that for the ones for 1st group. The side effects and complications had no statistical difference between the two groups.
Keywords
laryngeal mask airway; ultra sound; fiberoptic
Supplementary Files
References
  1. Agarwal A, Shobhana N. LMA in neurosurgery. Can J Anesth. 1995;42:750.
  2. Anatomy of the larynx, trachea and bronchi. Anaesthesia and İntensive Care Medicine. 2011;12:8.
  3. Anonymous fiberoptic infections. Lancet 1980;ii:782-3.
  4. Aoyama K, Takenaka I, Sata T, Shigematsu A: The triple airway manoeuvre for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed patients. Can J Anaesth; 1995;42:1010-6.
  5. Arul DA, R. Jacob MD, DA. A different under vision approach to a difficult intubation. Paediatric Anaesthesia 1999; 9(3) 260.
  6. Asai T, Morris S. The laryngeal mask airway: its features, effects and role. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41:930–960.
  7. Ayappa I, Rapoport DM. The upper airway in sleep: Physiology of the pharynx. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2003;7(1):9-33.
  8. Ball AJ. Laryngeal mask misplacement—a non problem. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:204.
  9. Ball AJ. Laryngeal mask misplacement—a non problem. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:204.
  10. Bannister HL. Respiratory system. Gray’s anatomy. 38th edition. ELBS – Churchill Livingstone 1995.
  11. Bennett J, Petito A, Zandsberg S. Use of the laryngeal mask airway in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54:1346–1351.
  12. Campbell RL, Biddle C, Assudmi N, Hotchkiss M: Fiberoptic assessment of laryngeal mask airway placement: blind insertion versus direct visual epiglottoscopy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004, 62:1108-13. -64-
  13. Gupta D, Srirajakalidindi A, Habli N, Haber H. Ultrasound confirmation of laryngeal mask airway placement correlates with fiberoptic laryngoscope findings. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2011; 21: 283-287.
  14. Hatfield A, Bodenham A. Portable ultrasonic scanning of the anterior neck before percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Anaesthesia 1999;54:660-3.
  15. Joshi S, Sciacca RR, Solanki DR, Young WL, Mathru MM. A prospective evaluation of clinical tests for placement of laryngeal mask airways. Anesthesiology 1998;89:1141–6.
  16. Shorten GD, Opie NJ, Graziotti P, Morris I, Khangure M. Assessment of upper airway anatomyin awake, sedatedand anaesthetised patients using magnetic resonance imaging. AnaesthIntensiveCare1994;22:165–9.
  17. Moustafa MA, Abdelhady Fiberoptic assessment of the laryngeal mask airway (Laryseal) position after one hour of positive pressure ventilation: an observational study. J Clin Anesth 2014;26:480–4.
  18. van Zundert AAJ, Wyssusek KH, Pelecanos A, Roets M, Kumar CM. A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00301-3. [Epub ahead of print].)
  19. Zhou Z F, Chen- Zhong xia, Meng Wu, Li - Na Yu, Guo- Zhang Yan, Qiu-Sheng Ren, Ci- Xian Hu, Min Yan. Comparison of three methods for the confirmation of LMA placement in female patients Undergoing Gynecologic surgery. J. Ultras med bio. 2014.12.002.
  20. N.Chandan, S. M. Sharma, U. S. Raveendra and B. Rajendra Prasad. Fiberoptic assessment of laryngeal mask airway placement. a comparison of blind insertion and insertion with the use of a laryngoscope. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2009 Jun;8(2):95-98.
  21. Wiryana M, AAJ Van Zundert, Sinardja K, Tjokorda Gde Agung Senapathi, I Gusti Ngurah Mahaalit Aribawa, I Gusti Putu Sukrana Sidemery and Doddy Timboel Soedarso. Accuration insertion LMA with Video Laryngoscope Compre with classic technique. SOJ Anesthesiol Pain Manag 4(1):1-4.
  22. Song K, Yi J, Liu W, Huang S, Huang Y. Confirmation of laryngeal mask airway placement by Ultrasound examination : a pilot study. J of Clinical Anesthesia 34,2016,638-646.
  23. JM Kim, JY Kim, WO Kim, HK kil. An ultrasound evaluation of laryngeal mask airway position in pediatric patients: an observational study. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2015;120(2):427-432.
  24. Kim GW, Kim JY, Kim SJ, Moon YR, Park EJ, Park SY. Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19:4.
  25. Ozgul et al. Comparison of videolaryngoscope-guided versus standard digital insertion techniques of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway. BMC Anesthesiolog (2019) 19:244. -70-
  26. Hernandez MR, Klock PA Jr, Ovassapian A. Evolution of the extraglottic airway: a review of its history, applications, and practical tips for success. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:349–68.
  27. Kim HC, Yoo DH, Kim HJ, Jeon YT, Hwang JW, Park HP. A prospective randomised comparison of two insertion methods for igel placement in anaesthetized paralysed patients: standard vs. rotational technique. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:729-34.) (Mc Crirrick A, Ramage DT, Pracilio JA, Hickman JA. Experience with the laryngeal mask airway in two hundred patients. Anaesth Intense Care.) 1991;19:256-60.
  28. L'Hermite J, Dubout E, Bouvet S, et al. Sore throat following three adult supraglottic airway devices: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34:417–24.
  29. Nakayama S, Osaka Y, Yamashita M. The rotational technique with a partially inflated laryngeal mask airway improves the ease of insertion in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002;12:416-9.
  30. Parker M. R. J., Day C. J. E. Visible and occult blood contamination of laryngeal mask airways and tracheal tubes used in adult anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(4):388–390. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01281.x.
  31. Pajiyar A. K., Wen Z., Wang H., Ma L., Miao L., Wang G. Comparisons of clinical performance of guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal. BMC Anesthesiology. 2015;15(1, article 69) doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0039-3.
  32. Maltby RJ, Beriault MT, Watson NC, et al. The LMA-ProSealTM is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anesth. 2002;49:857–862.
 

Statistics
Article View: 735
PDF Download: 911