Socket shield technique versus sticky bone in immediate dental implant in esthetic zone
abdelraheem, A., el feky, A., Hosny, A. (2022). Socket shield technique versus sticky bone in immediate dental implant in esthetic zone. EKB Journal Management System, 25(4), 445-453. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2021.62599.1164
Ahmed Moustafa abdelraheem; Ahmed el feky; Ahmed Mohammed Hosny. "Socket shield technique versus sticky bone in immediate dental implant in esthetic zone". EKB Journal Management System, 25, 4, 2022, 445-453. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2021.62599.1164
abdelraheem, A., el feky, A., Hosny, A. (2022). 'Socket shield technique versus sticky bone in immediate dental implant in esthetic zone', EKB Journal Management System, 25(4), pp. 445-453. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2021.62599.1164
abdelraheem, A., el feky, A., Hosny, A. Socket shield technique versus sticky bone in immediate dental implant in esthetic zone. EKB Journal Management System, 2022; 25(4): 445-453. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2021.62599.1164

Socket shield technique versus sticky bone in immediate dental implant in esthetic zone

Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science
Article 2, Volume 25, Issue 4, October 2022, Pages 445-453    PDF (1.39 M)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2021.62599.1164
Authors
Ahmed Moustafa abdelraheem* 1; Ahmed el feky2; Ahmed Mohammed Hosny3
1oral and maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of dental medicine, Alazhar university, Cairo, boys.
2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of dental medicine, Cairo, Boys, Al-Azhar University
3oral and maxillofacial surgery department , faculty of dental medicine, boys Cairo, alazhar university.
Abstract
Objective: The present study was performed to evaluate immediate implant placement with socket-shield technique versus using bone graft filling the jumping gap in the form of sticky bone in maxillary aesthetic zone.
Material and Methods: sixteen patients were included in this study (n=16). They were divided into two groups; group (I): eight Patients were subjected to socket shield procedure with immediate implant placement. Group (II): eight Patients were subjected to immediate implant placement with sticky bone in the jumping gap. After surgery each patient were evaluated clinically for: pain values, esthetic results using pink esthetic score (PES) and implant stability using ostell device. All patients received immediate and 6 months postoperative CBCT to assess bone density and the dimensional changes in the labial bone plates.
Results: The mean vertical bone loss value after 6 months in group I was 0.28 ± 0.13 mm contrary to group II which was 0.46 ± 0.19 mm which was statistically significant. The mean horizontal bone loss value after 6 months in group I was 0.17 ± .099 mm while in group II it was 0.25 ± 0.13 mm which was statistically not significant.
Conclusion: Both Socket shield technique and GBR using sticky bone preserved the labial bone thickness and height with superiority of socket shield in preservation of its height.
Key Words: Immediate implant; Socket shield; Sticky bone;
Keywords
Immediate implant; Socket shield; Sticky bone
Statistics
Article View: 375
PDF Download: 570