Evaluation of Dental Implant Angulation on Marginal Bone Loss in Posterior Maxillary Area | ||
Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science | ||
Article 3, Volume 25, Issue 4, October 2022, Pages 455-462 PDF (748.96 K) | ||
Document Type: Original Article | ||
DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2021.63052.1166 | ||
Authors | ||
Ibrahim Magdeldin Metwally* 1; Ahmed Hussein Elfeky2; Ahmed Mohammed Hosny3 | ||
1Oral and maxillofacial surgery ,dentistry ,al- Azhar ,Cairo ,Egypt | ||
2Oral and Maxillofacial surgery department ,faculty of dental medecine boys Azhar University | ||
3oral and maxillofacial surgery department , faculty of dental medicine, boys Cairo, alazhar university. | ||
Abstract | ||
ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the marginal bone loss in the angled implant in the posterior maxillary region. Subjects and methods: . To evaluate marginal bone loss by CBCT after 6 month of loading A total of 14 implants, 7 angled implants and 7 straight implants in posterior maxilla with surgical guide. seven patients ranged in age between 40.0 – 43.0 years with a mean age of 41.71 ± 1.25 years for Angulated implant group and seven patients ranged in age between 44.0 – 45.0 years with a mean age 44.43 ± 0.53 years for Straight implant group. flap less approach through surgical guide with angulation 25-30 for angled implant and straight implant without angulation. Results: Angulated implant showed a higher significant buccal marginal bone loss than Straight implant at prosthetic and 6 months after loading. Angulated implant showed a higher significant palatal marginal bone loss than Straight implant at prosthetic and 6 months after loading. Conclusion: the angled implant showed a higher significant marginal bone loss than the straight implant on the prosthesis and 6 months after loading. However, angulated implants can be a satisfactory alternative to vertical implants to avoid transplant procedures. | ||
Keywords | ||
posterior maxilla; angled implant; marginal bone loss | ||
Statistics Article View: 282 PDF Download: 665 |