Flexural Behavior of Concrete Box Girders Reinforced with Mixed Steel and Basalt Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars | ||
| JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences | ||
| Article 1, Volume 51, Issue 4, July and August 2023, Pages 223-241 PDF (1.14 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2023.170121.1176 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Hemdan Said* 1; Mahmoud Hassanean1; Yahia Hassanean2; Arafa Ibrahim1 | ||
| 1Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt | ||
| 2Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut Valley University, Assiut, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This paper presents an experimental study about the effect of the ratio between the area of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) bars to the total area of steel and BFRP bars (Af/At) on the behavior of Reinforced Concrete Box (RCB) girders. Also, it displays the effectiveness of the mixed steel and BFRP (MSBFRP) bars as the main reinforcement to enhance the behavior of RCB girders in flexure. Moreover, the ultimate flexural capacity of the tested girders was evaluated analytically. The experimental program consisted of five RCB girders. The first two girders were reinforced in the tension side with either steel or BFRP bars, while the other three ones were reinforced with both steel and BFRP bars with different Af/At ratios. The effect of Af/At ratio on the initiation and propagation of cracks, mode of failure, ultimate and cracking loads, the corresponding deflection, and ductility was investigated. It was found that increasing the Af/At ratio improved both the ultimate load and the deflection at failure, while the ductility index decreased. Comparing the obtained RCB test results with those found in the literature of the ordinary beams revealed that the behavior is almost identical. The Af/At ratio of about 50% to 70% is recommended in the design of hybrid RCB girders as it provides enough post elastic strength and stiffness for meeting the ductility requirement. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Reinforced concrete box girders; Reinforcement ratio; Mixed steel and BFRP bars; Ductility index; Analytical design | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] Luís João Ferreira Vieira, Longitudinal Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Box Girder Decks: Comparison between the Classical Formulations and the Generalized Beam Theory, M.Sc Thesis,
[2] Yuliang He, KaiWang, Zongyong Cao, Peijuan Zheng, and Yiqiang Xiang, Reinforcement Analysis of an Old Multi-Beam Box Girder Based on a New Embedded Steel Plate (ESP) Strengthening Method, J. Materials 2022, 15, 4353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124353
[3] Yousry B.I. Shaheen, Boshra Eltaly, and Amany Henish, Response of Reinforced Concrete Box Girders Strengthened with composite Materials, J. Research Square (2022), DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1666445/v1
[4] Savio John and Reshma Prasad, AN OVERVIEW ON BOX GIRDER BRIDGES, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) 4(2017) 522-524.
[5] Mayank Chourasia and Saleem Akhtar, Design and Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Box Girder by Finite Element Method (4 Cells & 1 Cell), International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering Research, 3 (2015) 413-421.
[6] Askar R. A. and Abd–Alkhalek M., (2012) “Response of R.C. Box Girders Strengthened using CFRP Sheets,” Journal of American Science, Vol. 8, No.12.
[7] Mohamed Elsedemy, Mohamed Kandil, Nageh N. Meleka, A State-of-the-Art Review on the Behavior of RC Beams with Different Types of FRP Reinforcement, Engineering Research Journal, 45 (2022) 591- 600.
[8] Ibrahim AMA, Wu Z, Fahmy MFM, Kamal D. Experimental Study on Cyclic Response of Concrete Bridge Columns Reinforced by Steel and Basalt FRP Reinforcements. J Compos Constr 2016;20:04015062.
[9] Wu, Z. S., Fahmy, M. F. M., and Wu, G. (2009). “Safety enhancement of urban structures with structural recoverability and controllability.” J. Earthquake Tsunami, 3(3), 143–174.
[10] Priestley, M., Seible, F., and Calvi, G. M. (1996). Seismic design and retrofit of bridges, Wiley, New York.
[11] Ashour AF. Flexural and shear capacities of concrete beams reinforced with GFPR bars. Constr Build Mater 2006;20:1005–15.
[12] Ashour AF, Habeeb MN. Continuous concrete beams reinforced with CFRP bars. Struct Build 2008;SB6:349–57.
[13] Z. H. Awadallah, M. Ahmed, O. Farghal et al., “Some Parameters Affecting Shear Behavior of High Strength Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams Longitudinally Reinforced with BFRP Rebars,” JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1163-1178, 2014.
[14] Barris C, Torres LI, Turon A, Baena M, Catalan A. An experimental study of the flexural behaviour of GFRP RC beams and comparison with prediction models. Compos Struct 2009;91:286–95.
[15] Benmokrane B, Chaallal O, Masmoudi R. Glass fibre reinforced plastic (GFRP) rebars for concrete structures. Constr Build Mater 1995;9(6):353–64.
[16] Brown VL, Bartholomew CL. FRP reinforcing bars in reinforced concrete members. ACI Mater J 1993;90(1):34–9.
[17] F. Elgabbas, P. Vincent, E. A. Ahmed, and B. Benmokrane, “Experimental Testing of Basalt-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars in Concrete Beams,” Compos. Part B Eng., Vol. 91, pp. 205–218, Apr. 2016.
[18] M. El-Mogy, A. El-Ragaby, E. El-Salakawy, “Flexural behavior of continuous FRP-reinforced concrete beams” J. Compos. Constr. 14 (6) (2010) 669–680.
[19] S. Sirimontree, S. Keawsawasvong, and C. Thongchom, “Flexural Behavior of Concrete Beam Reinforced with GFRP Bars Compared to Concrete Beam Reinforced with Conventional Steel Reinforcements,” J. Appl. Sci. Eng., Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 883–890, 2021.
[20] ACI 440.1R-15. Guide for the design and construction of structural concrete reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI (American Concrete Institute), (2015). 83.
[21] CSA S806-12. Design and construction of building components with fibre-reinforced polymers. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA (Canadian Standard Association). (2012).
[22] M.A. Aiello, L. Ombres, Structural performances of concrete beams with hybrid (fiber-reinforced polymer–steel) reinforcements, J. Compos. Constr. 6 (2) (2002) 133–140.
[23] Ahmed El Refai, Farid Abed, Abdullah Al-Rahmani, Structural performance and serviceability of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid (GFRP and steel) bars, J. Construction and Building Materials 96 (2015) 518–529.
[24] Ibrahim HA, Fahmy MF. Finite-Element Analysis of Flexural Behavior of Hybrid Steel-FRP Continuous Reinforced Concrete (HSFCRC) Beams. The 6th Asia-Pacific Conference on FRP in Structures (APFIS2017). Singapore: The International Institute for FRP in Construction (IIFC); 2017.
[25] Ibrahim AMA, Fahmy MFM, Wu Z. 3D finite element modeling of bond-controlled behavior of steel and basalt FRP-reinforced concrete square bridge columns under lateral loading. Compos Struct 2016; 143:33–52.
[26] Haitham A. Ibrahim, Mohamed F.M. Fahmy, and Zhishen Wu, Numerical study of steel-to-FRP reinforcement ratio as a design-tool controlling the lateral response of SFRC beam-column joints, J. Engineering Structures 172 (2018) 253–274.
[27] I. F. Kara, A. F. Ashour, and M. A. Köroğlu, “Flexural Behavior of Hybrid FRP/Steel Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Compos. Struct., Vol. 129, pp. 111–121, Oct. 2015.
[28] Lau D, Pam HJ. Experimental study of hybrid FRP reinforced concrete beams. Eng Struct 2010;32:3857–65.
[29] Suzan A.A. Mustafa and Hilal A. Hassan, “Behavior of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid steel and FRP composites” HBRC Journal 14 (2018) 300–308.
[30] L. Pang, W. Qu, P. Zhu et al., “Design propositions for hybrid FRP-steel reinforced concrete beams,” Journal of Composites for Construction, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 04015086, 2016.
[31] Renyuan Qin, Ao Zhou, and Denvid Lau, “Effect of reinforcement ratio on the flexural performance of hybrid FRP reinforced concrete beams”, J. Composites Part B, 108 (2017) 200-209.
[32] W. Qu, X. Zhang, H. Huang, Flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid (GFRP and steel) bars, J. Compos. Constr., ASCE 13 (5) (2009) 350–359.
[33] Xiangjie Ruan, Chunhua Lu, Ke Xu, Guangyu Xuan, Mingzhi Ni “Flexural behavior and serviceability of concrete beams hybrid-reinforced with GFRP bars and steel bars,” J. Composite structures, vol. 235, pp. 111772, 2020.
[34] M.A. Safan, Flexural behavior and design of steel–GFRP reinforced concrete beams, ACI Mater. J. 110 (6) (2013) 677–685.
[35] AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications: US Customary Units: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2010.
[36] Xue X, Wu M, Li Z and Zhou P 2020 Numerical analysis of dead load shear force distribution in webs of multicell inclined web box-girder bridge Advances in Civil Engineering 2020 pp 1-10
[37] Tvrtko Renić, and Tomislav Kišiček; “Ductility of Concrete Beams Reinforced with FRP
Rebars” MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations, 2021, 11, 424. https:// doi.org/10.3390/buildings11090424.
[38] R. Park, "Ductility evaluation from laboratory and analytical testing." pp. 605-616.
[39] Naani, A., “Flexural Behavior and Design of RC Members Using FRP Reinforcement,” Journal of Structural Engineering, V. 119, No. 11, Nov. 1993, pp. 3344-3359.
[40] Jaeger GL, Tadros G, Mufti AA. “The concept of the overall performance factor in rectangular-section reinforced concrete beams” Proc of 3rd int symp on non-metallic (FRP) reinforcement for concrete structures, vol. 2, Sapporo, Japan; 1997. p. 551–8.
[41] Victor C. Li and Shuxin Wang “Flexural Behaviors of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Reinforced Engineered Cementitious Composite Beams” ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL, 99 (2002) 11-21.
[42] K. Arivalagan, and K. Kandasamy, “Energy absorption capacity of composite beams,” J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 145-150, 2009. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 477 PDF Download: 728 |
||
