Clinical versus Video-Assisted Teaching Method on Nursing Students' Achievement Regarding Cranial Nerve Assessment | ||||
| Egyptian Journal of Health Care | ||||
| Volume 14, Issue 2, June 2023, Page 700-708 PDF (574.99 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ejhc.2023.302613 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Dalia Masoud Elsaid Hafez1; Walaa El-khanany Zahran2 | ||||
| 1Lecturer at Medical Surgical Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Egypt | ||||
| 2Lecturer at Medical Surgical Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Damietta University, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background: Cranial nerve testing represents an essential part of neurological examination; it helps to identify neurological conditions and is useful for indicating any abnormal neurological disease processes. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of clinical versus video-assisted teaching methods on nursing students' achievement regarding cranial nerve assessment. Subjects and Method: A quasi-experimental research design has been utilized and conducted on 2nd level B.Sc. Nursing students at Damietta University. A convenient sample was used in this study, comprised of 70 students, and was classified into two equal groups. Group I used the video-assisted teaching method, and Group II used the clinical teaching method. Two tools have been used in this research: tool I, the structured interviewing questionnaire, which consists of two sections: section 1 to assess demographic data and section II to assess students' knowledge regarding cranial nerve assessment. Tool II, a rubric for cranial nerve assessment, to assess students' competency level during cranial nerve assessment. Results indicated that there was a change in the students' knowledge and competency levels between the pretest and posttest in Group I, which used the video-assisted teaching method; also, a difference was observed between the pretest and posttest in Group II, which used the clinical teaching method. Conclusion: Both clinical and video-assisted teaching methods were effective in improving nursing students' achievement regarding cranial nerve assessment. But the clinical method was slightly more effective than the video-assisted teaching method in improving competency level. Recommendation, Clinical and video-assisted teaching methods are recommended to use for improving students' knowledge and competency level regarding cranial nerve assessment. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Achievement; Cranial Nerve Assessment; Clinical teaching; Nursing Students; Video- assisted teaching | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 319 PDF Download: 411 |
||||
