Induced Cucumber Plant Resistance to Meloidogyne incognita By Certain Biotic and Abiotic Inducers in Relation to Some Biochemical.
Y., T., Kassab, A., Sobeiha, A., Mahgoob, A., Elkelany, U. (2023). Induced Cucumber Plant Resistance to Meloidogyne incognita By Certain Biotic and Abiotic Inducers in Relation to Some Biochemical.. EKB Journal Management System, 15(2), 81-89. doi: 10.21608/eajbsz.2023.322135
Taher I. Y.; A. S. Kassab; A. k. Sobeiha; A. E. Mahgoob; U. S. Elkelany. "Induced Cucumber Plant Resistance to Meloidogyne incognita By Certain Biotic and Abiotic Inducers in Relation to Some Biochemical.". EKB Journal Management System, 15, 2, 2023, 81-89. doi: 10.21608/eajbsz.2023.322135
Y., T., Kassab, A., Sobeiha, A., Mahgoob, A., Elkelany, U. (2023). 'Induced Cucumber Plant Resistance to Meloidogyne incognita By Certain Biotic and Abiotic Inducers in Relation to Some Biochemical.', EKB Journal Management System, 15(2), pp. 81-89. doi: 10.21608/eajbsz.2023.322135
Y., T., Kassab, A., Sobeiha, A., Mahgoob, A., Elkelany, U. Induced Cucumber Plant Resistance to Meloidogyne incognita By Certain Biotic and Abiotic Inducers in Relation to Some Biochemical.. EKB Journal Management System, 2023; 15(2): 81-89. doi: 10.21608/eajbsz.2023.322135

Induced Cucumber Plant Resistance to Meloidogyne incognita By Certain Biotic and Abiotic Inducers in Relation to Some Biochemical.

Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences, B. Zoology
Volume 15, Issue 2, December 2023, Page 81-89  XML PDF (449.29 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/eajbsz.2023.322135
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Taher I. Y.1; A. S. Kassab1; A. k. Sobeiha1; A. E. Mahgoob1; U. S. Elkelany2
1Plant Protection Dep., Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University
2Plant Pathology Department, National Research Center, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the role of certain abiotic and biotic inducers in inducing cucumber resistance against the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, under greenhouse conditions. The abiotic inducers comprised acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and Indole acetic acid (IAA) while the biotic inducer was Bacillus pumilus (B.P.). The results revealed that, among all treatments, the double combinations of IAA before B.P. by 3 days as well as ASA before B.P.by 3 days showed the best treatments to increase plant resistance against Meloidogyne incognita infection and improved plant vigor based on fresh and dry weights of shoots and roots compared to using them individually and control inoculated non-treated plants. A generalized increase was observed in the peroxidase activities and in proline amino acids and total phenols due to the application of the investigated inducer. The degree of increase differed according to treatment and biochemical aspects. The overproduction of these biochemical aspects may play a part in the induction of plant defenses against nematode infestation. In conclusion, the development of safety control measures by inducing plant resistance will protect a wide range of plant crops against nematode threats and can be used in integrated pest management programs.
Keywords
Cucumber cv. Madinah; Meloidogyne incognita; indole acetic acid; Acetyl Salicylic Acid; Bacillus pumilus; Induced systemic resistance
Statistics
Article View: 120
PDF Download: 309