The effect of applying a new formulation of CaCl2 on surface hardness of conventional glass ionomer | ||||
Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research | ||||
Article 8, Volume 3, Issue 2, December 2023, Page 207-217 PDF (391.64 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original research articles | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/jfcr.2023.234105.1054 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Mirna Ashraf Soliman ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||||
1Operative, Dentistry, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
2Head & Professor of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
3Head & Professor of Operative Dentistry, Operative Department, Faculty of Dentistry, The Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. | ||||
4Professor of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
5Lecturer of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Background: Glass ionomer cements (GIC) have excellent biocompatibility and fluoride release properties; however, they suffer from moisture sensitivity and low mechanical properties. Calcium chloride (CaCl2) in solution form improved the surface hardness of GIC. Some authors suggested the preparation of a new formulation of CaCl2 to be more stable in application. Surface hardness was measured at baseline and after pH-cycling protocol. Aim of the study: to evaluate the effect of CaCl2 application in both solution and gel forms on the surface hardness of the GIC at baseline and after pH cycling. Materials and Methods: Thirty disc-shaped specimens were prepared from Fuji IX GIC and divided into three groups according to different surface treatments, (n=10); group 1 (control), group 2 (CaCl2 solution) and group 3 (CaCl2 in gel form). pH-cycling protocol was done for all specimens using 5% acetic acid (pH=3) twice /day, rinsed, dried and then stored in distilled water. This cycle was repeated for 14 days. Surface hardness was measured at baseline and after pH-cycling. Results: At baseline and after pH-cycling, the control group showed the lowest mean hardness. Two other CaCl2 gel and CaCl2 sol. showed insignificant differences between each other. pH-cycling resulted in a significant decrease in surface hardness in all groups compared to baseline. Conclusions: Both CaCl2 forms improved surface hardness of self-setting GICs. Yet, handling of gel-form was easier. pH-cycling protocol deteriorated surface hardness values of all groups. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Calcium chloride; Fuji IX; Glass ionomer cement; pH-cycling; Surface hardness | ||||
Statistics Article View: 124 PDF Download: 351 |
||||