Comparison Between Non-Invasive and Invasive Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity in Patients with Classical and Paradoxical Lflg-As.
(2020). Comparison Between Non-Invasive and Invasive Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity in Patients with Classical and Paradoxical Lflg-As.. EKB Journal Management System, 4(1), -. doi: 10.21608/cvrepj.2020.351765
. "Comparison Between Non-Invasive and Invasive Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity in Patients with Classical and Paradoxical Lflg-As.". EKB Journal Management System, 4, 1, 2020, -. doi: 10.21608/cvrepj.2020.351765
(2020). 'Comparison Between Non-Invasive and Invasive Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity in Patients with Classical and Paradoxical Lflg-As.', EKB Journal Management System, 4(1), pp. -. doi: 10.21608/cvrepj.2020.351765
Comparison Between Non-Invasive and Invasive Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity in Patients with Classical and Paradoxical Lflg-As.. EKB Journal Management System, 2020; 4(1): -. doi: 10.21608/cvrepj.2020.351765

Comparison Between Non-Invasive and Invasive Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity in Patients with Classical and Paradoxical Lflg-As.

Cardiovascular Research Prove Journal
Volume 4, Issue 1, 2020    PDF (178.31 K)
Document Type: Abstracts
DOI: 10.21608/cvrepj.2020.351765
Abstract
The present study compares the echocardiographic criteria 
for the grading of aortic valve stenosis with the invasive 
criteria in patients with classical LFLG-AS and in patients 
with paradoxical LFLG-AS.
Statistics
Article View: 54
PDF Download: 26