Enhancing Assessment Methods in Architectural Design Studio: A Proposal for Criteria-Based Evaluation | ||||
| The Egyptian International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Technology | ||||
| Volume 48, Issue 1, December 2024, Page 35-51 PDF (1023.22 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/eijest.2024.288152.1273 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Mohamed Salah ezz   1; Hebatallah A. Elsayed 2
| ||||
| 1Department of Architecture, The Higher Institute for Engineering and Technology, Obour City - K21 Cairo/Bilbies Rd, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Civil Engineering department, Institute of Engineering Research and New and Renewable Energy, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| This paper evaluates current assessment methods in architectural design studios and proposes a criteria-based approach to enhance evaluation processes. The study utilizes a literature review and case studies to analyze existing practices and highlights the importance of transparent and fair evaluations. By implementing a standardized model with clearly defined assessment criteria, students gain a better understanding of expectations and parameters, fostering creativity and minimizing subjective evaluations. The research emphasizes the significance of promoting students' mental and emotional well-being by providing a clear understanding of assessment processes, thereby reducing stress and anxiety.The findings demonstrate a notable improvement in the consistency of evaluations between instructors and guide assessments. Initially, there was a mean deviation of 32.42% between the assessments made by instructors and guide assessments. However, after implementing the criteria-based evaluation approach, this mean deviation significantly reduced to 8.55%, indicating a more aligned and objective assessment process. The study also includes the results of a poll on self-assessment tasks, where 70% of students acknowledged the positive contribution of self-assessment to project quality. Moreover, 68% of students reported enhanced abilities to provide constructive feedback on their peers' projects through self-assessment, Overall, the study underscores the need for a criteria-based approach in architectural design studios, as it promotes evaluation consistency,quality improvement,and student learning experiences. Furthermore, the research suggests that with further practice and training, the criteria-based evaluation approach can be refined, leading to even more consistent evaluations among assessors. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Design studio context; Conventional design studio; Design process; Studios evaluation; Studio practices | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 3,327 PDF Download: 819 |
||||
