Comparative study between the complications of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass | ||
| The Egyptian Journal of Surgery | ||
| Volume 36, Issue 4, October 2017 PDF (623.85 K) | ||
| DOI: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_49_17 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Tamer Nabil; Ahmed Hussein; Ahmed Nabil | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Background Obesity is considered a preventable worldwide epidemic. It can cause high rates of morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) are both safe and effective procedures for the surgical management of morbid obesity. Bleeding and leakage are the most fearful life-threatening complications. Patient and methods This prospective study comprised 150 morbidly obese patients. The study was conducted between July 2015 and March 2016, after which there was a follow-up for 12 months among all the patients. The patients were divided equally into two groups: group A comprised LSG patients, whereas group B comprised LMGB patients. Results Among the Group A patients, four (5.3%) exhibited complications: hemorrhage (1.3%), gastric leakage (1.3%), and gall-bladder stones (2.6%). In group B, five (6.6%) patients had complications: biliary reflux (1.3%), deep venous thrombosis (1.3%), and gall-bladder stones (3.9%). No mortality occurred in the study. Conclusion Both LSG and LMGB are safe and effective procedures. The study found no statistically significant difference between either procedure, in the incidence of complications. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Bariatric surgery; Leakage; mini-gastric bypass; Morbid Obesity; sleeve gastrectomy | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 36 PDF Download: 30 |
||
