HARMONIC SCALPEL AS A SINGLE INSTRUMENT IN MODIFIED RADICAL MASTECTOMY. IS IT MORE COST EFFECTIVE THAN ELECTROCAUTERY AND LIGATURE? | ||||
| The Egyptian Journal of Surgery | ||||
| Volume 29, Issue 2, April 2010, Page 59-63 PDF (1.07 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ejsur.2010.367565 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| Ashraf Khater* | ||||
| Department of Surgical Oncology, Mansoura oncology center, Mansoura, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Aim: Electrocautery is proved to be associated with increased seroma during mastectomy. This study aimed at comparing mastectomy using harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery and whether the harmonic scalpel is cost effective or not؟ Methods: This study included sixty females undergoing modified radical mastectomy .Thirty were operated with harmonic scalpel and thirty with electrocautery .We compared operative time, blood loss, total drainage volume and days, pain score, total dose of nalbuphine and incidence of sermoa, hematoma and flap necrosis. Results: There was no statistical difference between two groups as regard operative time (P=0.12), seroma (P=0.2), hematoma (P=0.7) and flap necrosis (P=1). There was a highly significant difference (P<0.001) regarding blood loss, total drainage volume and days, pain score and the total dose of nalbuphine. Hospital stay was not shortened because all patients were routinely discharged after three days. Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel in mastectomy significantly reduces blood loss, postoperative pain, total drainage volume and days but does not lower operative time, seroma, total hospital stay and till now cannot be considered cost effective. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Ultrasonic scissors; breast; diathermy | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 72 PDF Download: 43 |
||||
