MINIMALLY INVASIVE VIDEO-ASSISTED THYROIDECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL THYROIDECTOMY: A SINGLE-BLINDED, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
El-labban, G. (2010). MINIMALLY INVASIVE VIDEO-ASSISTED THYROIDECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL THYROIDECTOMY: A SINGLE-BLINDED, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL. EKB Journal Management System, 29(1), 10-17. doi: 10.21608/ejsur.2010.367574
Gouda El-labban. "MINIMALLY INVASIVE VIDEO-ASSISTED THYROIDECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL THYROIDECTOMY: A SINGLE-BLINDED, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL". EKB Journal Management System, 29, 1, 2010, 10-17. doi: 10.21608/ejsur.2010.367574
El-labban, G. (2010). 'MINIMALLY INVASIVE VIDEO-ASSISTED THYROIDECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL THYROIDECTOMY: A SINGLE-BLINDED, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL', EKB Journal Management System, 29(1), pp. 10-17. doi: 10.21608/ejsur.2010.367574
El-labban, G. MINIMALLY INVASIVE VIDEO-ASSISTED THYROIDECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL THYROIDECTOMY: A SINGLE-BLINDED, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL. EKB Journal Management System, 2010; 29(1): 10-17. doi: 10.21608/ejsur.2010.367574