Nonmelanoma facial skin cancer: surgical planning for resection and reconstruction | ||||
| The Egyptian Journal of Surgery | ||||
| Volume 43, Issue 2, April 2024 PDF (3.64 MB) | ||||
| DOI: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_294_23 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Nasr Al-Qadasi; Yahia Al-Sayaghi; Abdullfatah Al-tam; Raddad AL-Fakih | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Introduction The most effective treatment for nonmelanotic fascial skin cancer is surgical excision. Preoperative planning and a thorough grasp of reconstructive procedures, such as primary closure skin grafting, locoregional tissue flaps, remote tissue flaps, and free tissue transfer, are essential for the surgical therapy of these tumors. The choice of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) therapy is very specific to each patient and is influenced by the patient's age, size, histologic subtype, and location of the disease. Treatment is to obliterate the lesion while maintaining normal tissue, function, and appearance. The ideas and methods of surgical excision and reconstruction of skin malignancies unique to the face were covered in this study. Patients and methods This study involved 98 patients of various ages and sexes. Of them, 89% had basal cell carcinoma and 11% had squamous cell carcinoma, both low-and high-risk tumors with varying sizes, locations, and histological subtypes. A safety margin of 3–5 mm is used for excision of low-risk malignancies and 5–10 mm for high-risk cancers. In 17 patients, skin grafts (split-thickness skin grafts and full-thickness skin grafts) are employed. 56 patients underwent local advancement, transposition, and rotational flaps; 15 patients underwent regional interpolation flaps; 6 patients sustained neck lymph node infiltration so they underwent cervical block dissection and distant pedicled flaps as latissimus dorsi muscle flaps; and 4 patients underwent cervical block dissection and free tissue transfer. Results Six patients experienced problems in the form of two partial graft and flap losses, two wound infections, and one scar retraction; however, with targeted care, they recovered well. Ninety-two percent of patients found the cosmetic outcomes satisfactory, and the functional outcome was good. Conclusion Wide excision and appropriate surgical reconstruction are ideal treatment modalities and may yield good aesthetic results or functional outcome, also the use of split-thickness skin grafts does not come as a first priority, where a lot of cases could have been treated with local flaps, as demonstrated in this consecutive series of treated patients. Treatment of NMSC on the face required a basic knowledge, presents a challenge to plastic surgeons, and is based on achieving the best oncological, functional, and cosmetic result. It is crucial to emphasize the need of patient education and appropriate tumor monitoring after NMSC therapy. A review of a big series of facial malignancy that may guide further studies cannot be understated. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| nonmelanoma; Reconstruction; Surgery | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 83 PDF Download: 93 |
||||
