Comparative study between lightweight poliglecaprone meshes versus traditional heavyweight polypropylene meshes for the repair of inguinal hernia
El-Shafey, M., Ramadan, M. (2019). Comparative study between lightweight poliglecaprone meshes versus traditional heavyweight polypropylene meshes for the repair of inguinal hernia. EKB Journal Management System, 3(2), 365-371. doi: 10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_37_19
Mohammad H El-Shafey; Muhammad Ramadan. "Comparative study between lightweight poliglecaprone meshes versus traditional heavyweight polypropylene meshes for the repair of inguinal hernia". EKB Journal Management System, 3, 2, 2019, 365-371. doi: 10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_37_19
El-Shafey, M., Ramadan, M. (2019). 'Comparative study between lightweight poliglecaprone meshes versus traditional heavyweight polypropylene meshes for the repair of inguinal hernia', EKB Journal Management System, 3(2), pp. 365-371. doi: 10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_37_19
El-Shafey, M., Ramadan, M. Comparative study between lightweight poliglecaprone meshes versus traditional heavyweight polypropylene meshes for the repair of inguinal hernia. EKB Journal Management System, 2019; 3(2): 365-371. doi: 10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_37_19

Comparative study between lightweight poliglecaprone meshes versus traditional heavyweight polypropylene meshes for the repair of inguinal hernia

The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls
Volume 3, Issue 2, May 2019, Pages 365-371    PDF (1010.67 K)
DOI: 10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_37_19
Authors
Mohammad H El-Shafey; Muhammad Ramadan
Abstract
Introduction
The ideal outcome of inguinal hernia surgery is to provide a repair that is free from recurrence, pain and infection with minimal scarring and with improvement in patient's quality of life.
Aim of the work
Is to compare lightweight poliglecaprone (Ultrapropolypropylene/Monocryl), UltraPro™ mesh with the standard heavyweight polypropylene mesh in tension free Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.
Patients and methods
The current study included 200 patients complained of uncomplicated inguinal hernia and they were randomized into two groups according to the type of mesh used in tension free Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Group I, 100 patients received the standard polypropylene mesh. Group II, 100 patients received light weight UltraPro™ mesh, using sutures for their fixation.
Results
The UltraPro™ (LWM) mesh proved to be as safe and effective as the standard (HWM) prolene mesh in repair of uncomplicated inguinal hernia. There was no difference between the two groups as regard to the technical difficulties, operative complications and surgeons were equally satisfied. There was more incidence of chronic pain with prolene mesh (25%) compared to (zero%) with UltraPro™ mesh. The mesh fixation time and the overall operative time were shorter with UltraPro™ mesh.
Conclusion
The shorter operative time and the no-need to use analgesics could partially compensate the higher cost of UltraPro™ mesh in the absence of other economic factors such as the duration of patient improvement and return to work.
Keywords
Hernia; Inguinal; Lichtenstein; Mesh; UltraPro™
Statistics
Article View: 56
PDF Download: 28