Utility of 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) in evaluation of primary malignant bone tumors | ||||
| Zagazig University Medical Journal | ||||
| Article 36, Volume 30, Issue 7, October 2024, Page 3562-3574 PDF (1.01 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2024.302802.3468 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
ahmed fekry salem   1; Dalia Heshmat Ebrahim AbdelHamid2; Khalid Abdelhamid Ibrahim2; Nesma Zeed3
| ||||
| 1Department of Radiodiagnosis, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt | ||||
| 2Department of Radiodiagnosis, Zagazig University | ||||
| 3Faculty of Medicine Zagazig University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background: The pathophysiology of bone malignancies has become better understood owing to the appearance of hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) modality which has a huge influence on treatment strategies. The study aimed to clarify the supplementary benefits of PET/CT in the staging of primary bone malignancies and the assessment of post-therapeutic response. Methods: Thirty six patients with pathologically proven primary malignant bone tumors were included in this cross-sectional prospective study. Every patient had PET/CT scan performed for staging/restaging and evaluation of therapeutic response. The gold standard reference to verify the accuracy of the study results was biopsy/histopathology. Results: FDG-PET/CT demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity than CT in evaluation of therapeutic response and follow-up of cases to detect residual/recurrent lesions with sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 100%, positive and negative predicative values 100% and 87.5% respectively and overall accuracy 94.4%. Meanwhile, CT sensitivity was 81.8%, specificity 71.4%, positive and negative predicative value were 81.8% and 71.4% and accuracy 77.8%. Conclusion: As a promising non-invasive diagnostic method for evaluating primary bone malignancies; PET/CT is an imaging modality that offers a high specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Primary malignant bone tumors; FDG; PET; CT | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 142 PDF Download: 83 |
||||
