Direct Ophthalmoscopy versus Fundus Photography in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus | ||
| Zagazig University Medical Journal | ||
| Article 39, Volume 30, Issue 7, October 2024, Pages 3596-3606 PDF (606.17 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2024.307231.3492 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Ghada Mohammed Abdellatif1; Attyat Youssef Kamel* 2; Haitham Y. Al-Nashar3; Ihab A. Ahmed1 | ||
| 1Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine – Zagazig University | ||
| 2Resident of Pediatrics, Al Ahrar Teaching Hospital, Zagazig | ||
| 3Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine – Zagazig University | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Background: Clinical fundus examination in addition to fundus photography of Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) children patients to detect complications like diabetic retinopathy (DR). This study aimed to evaluate direct ophthalmoscopy accuracy compared to fundus photography in diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in children with T1DM at Zagazig University Hospital. Methods: We carried out this cross-sectional study on 42 children diagnosed with T1DM for over five years who attended the Pediatrics Outpatient Clinic at Zagazig University Hospital. Routine laboratory investigations, such as complete blood count and blood glucose level, HbA1c, and albumin/creatinine ratio in urine, were done on all patients, in addition to direct ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography, for diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Results: Direct ophthalmoscopy had a sensitivity of 25% and a specificity of 100%. On the other hand, fundus photography demonstrated a sensitivity of 80.69% and a specificity of 92.23%. Regarding PPV and NPV, direct ophthalmoscopy showed a PPV of 100% and an NPV of 75%. Conclusion: Direct ophthalmoscopy's sensitivity and specificity for detecting the presence and severity of DR were found to be lower than the recommended levels for a DR screening test. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Direct Ophthalmoscopy; Fundus Photography; Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 157 PDF Download: 80 |
||
