An overview of current status of Salmonellosis in duck farms in Egypt | ||||
Egyptian Journal of Animal Health | ||||
Volume 4, Issue 3, July 2024, Page 182-189 PDF (316.22 K) | ||||
Document Type: Reviews articles | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/ejah.2024.374425 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Abstract | ||||
In the last two decades, the consumption of duck meat has increased rapidly, and it is expected that it will continue to grow in the future. In Egypt, ducks are regarded as a secondary meat source. More focus has been directed in recent years on enhancing meat production through duck breeding. In the rural area, ducks were well-known for their flavorful and tasty meat. Additionally, it's highly disease resistance was stated for a long time. Salmonella considered as one of the most important pathogens that incriminated in several economic losses to poultry industry. Recently, the appearance of antimicrobial resistances in Salmonella isolates contributed to the inability to control Salmonella infection in duck farms. Therefore this review will focus on the Salmonella isolation from ducks in particular, its incidence rate, serotypes, antimicrobial resistance patterns, different alternative therapy to antibiotics. In Egypt, the incidence rates of Salmonella in duck farms ranged from 0.5% to 20%. The most common serotype that recorded in duck farms was S. Typhimurium. The highest antibiotic resistances reported were aganist amoxicillin, cephradine, colistin sulfate, ampicillin, tetracycline, streptomycin, lincomycin and erythromycin. Recently, the misuses of antibiotics results in bacterial resistances in both human and animal fields. Therefore, the need to find alternatives to antibiotics is an important issue. Some substances like lactic acid, Prebiotics, probiotics, symbiotics, essential oils, cinnamaldehyde, organic acids, nanoparticles and chitosan exhibited antibacterial effectively against Salmonella. One of the most effective control measures against Salmonella was bacteriophage treatments that prevent bacterial colonization in the intestinal tracts of birds. The vaccines may provide promising results in the control and prevention of avian Salmonellosis. The findings in this review highlighted the needs of antimicrobial surveillances and biosecurity programs that should be implemented to control the Salmonella infections in different duck farms. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Salmonella; duck farms; Egypt | ||||
Full Text | ||||
An overview of current status of Salmonellosis in duck farms in Egypt Rehab I Hamed1, Nehal M. Nabil2, Maram M. Tawakol2 and Sally H Abou- Khadra3 1Departement of poultry diseases, Reference Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control On Poultry Production (RLQP), Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Zagazig branch, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Zagazig 44516, Egypt. 2Reference Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control On Poultry Production (RLQP), Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Nadi El-Seid Street, Dokki 12618, Giza, Egypt. 3 Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Zagazig branch, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Zagazig 44516, Egypt. Abstract In the last two decades, the consumption of duck meat has increased rapidly, and it is expected that it will continue to grow in the future. In Egypt, ducks are regarded as a secondary meat source. More focus has been directed in recent years on enhancing meat production through duck breeding. In the rural area, ducks were well-known for their flavorful and tasty meat. Additionally, it's highly disease resistance was stated for a long time. Salmonella considered as one of the most important pathogens that incriminated in several economic losses to poultry industry. Recently, the appearance of antimicrobial resistances in Salmonella isolates contributed to the inability to control Salmonella infection in duck farms. Therefore this review will focus on the Salmonella isolation from ducks in particular, its incidence rate, serotypes, antimicrobial resistance patterns, different alternative therapy to antibiotics. In Egypt, the incidence rates of Salmonella in duck farms ranged from 0.5% to 20%. The most common serotype that recorded in duck farms was S. Typhimurium. The highest antibiotic resistances reported were aganist amoxicillin, cephradine, colistin sulfate, ampicillin, tetracycline, streptomycin, lincomycin and erythromycin. Recently, the misuses of antibiotics results in bacterial resistances in both human and animal fields. Therefore, the need to find alternatives to antibiotics is an important issue. Some substances like lactic acid, Prebiotics, probiotics, symbiotics, essential oils, cinnamaldehyde, organic acids, nanoparticles and chitosan exhibited antibacterial effectively against Salmonella. One of the most effective control measures against Salmonella was bacteriophage treatments that prevent bacterial colonization in the intestinal tracts of birds. The vaccines may provide promising results in the control and prevention of avian Salmonellosis. The findings in this review highlighted the needs of antimicrobial surveillances and biosecurity programs that should be implemented to control the Salmonella infections in different duck farms. Key words: Salmonella, duck farms, Egypt Introduction A significant portion of the poultry industry worldwide is comprised of duck breeding. In Egypt, more attention is focused lately on increasing meat production, particularly ducks which are considered the easiest domestic poultry (ElSoukkary et al., 2005). Due to their ability to adapt to a variety of environmental and natural situations, ducks are becoming more and more important and well-liked in Egypt. (Galal et al., 2011). There is no match information about duck’s populations in many countries. There were 1.15 billion ducks (Anas spp.) worldwide of which 1.0 billion (88 percent) were found in Asia. The largest duck populations were found in China (FAO, 2017). Detection of Salmonellosis is considered a good tool in protection of poultry industry (FAO, 1994). Furthermore, Salmonellosis is one of the most important bacterial diseases in poultry causing heavy economic loss through mortality and reduced production (Haider et al., 2004). Salmonella is a zoonotic microorganism (Liu et al., 2018) that responsible for foodborne illness globally (Igbinosa et al., 2023) and considered as one of the major global pathogen affecting poultry industry (Sorour et al., 2023). Ducks are one of the main reservoirs of Salmonella pathogen transmitted to human being (Khalifa et al., 2021& Sorour et al., 2023). Numerous Salmonella serovars are existing. There are 2,600 serovars which grouped depending on the reactivity of antisera to O and H antigens (Stevens et al., 2009). The most pathogenic serovars in avian species are Salmonella pullorum and Salmonella gallinarium, which cause systemic illness and considerable economic losses in the poultry sector. Non-typhoidal Salmonella serotypes (Paratyphoid illness) provide a public health risk due to their role in food poisoning issues as well as their zoonotic significance (El-Saadony et al., 2022). Many Salmonella serotypes were reported in ducks, mostly have public health significance and some, including S. pullorum, S. gallinarum, S. enteritidis, S. typhimurium, and S. anatum caused considerable losses in the young birds lower than few-weeks old (Buxton, 1957). The infected ducks with Salmonella do not show any apparent clinical symptoms but rather exist as asymptomatic carriers (Yu et al., 2008) and the disease spreads rapidly resulting in serious losses in duck breeding industry (Zhao et al., 2022). One of the most causes of egg contamination and persistent infections in laying ducks caused by S. enteritidis (Song et al., 2022). Incidence of Salmonella infection in ducks farm in Egypt Salmonella was isolated from ducks, duckling and duck egg at Mansoura Governorate (Egypt) with incidences of 14.5%, 18.5% and 10% respectively. The most recorded serotypes were S. Typhimurium and S. Enteriditis (El-Gaos et al., 2020). Another study conducted in 2020 by El-Maghraby et al., (2020) on Egyptian duck farms recovered S. Typhimurium with a percentage of 20%, and this finding illustrated that most of the duck farms from which the Egyptian S. Typhimurium strain were located in the same geographical area in cattle farms adherent to the duck farms which indicated lack in the biosecurity requirements, that could facilitate the circulation and transmission of Salmonella strains between the human beings and animal farms, including duck farms. Badr and Nasef, (2016) mentioned that S. Typhimurium that isolated from Pekin duck farm suffered from higher mortality with 95% was responsible for 93% of the Salmonella infections in ducklings. Some research studies reported lower incidences of Salmonella isolation. Abd-El-Rahman et al., (2000) isolated Salmonella with an incidence of 20% from 10 duck flocks in North Sinai while (Khalifa et al., 2021) recorded an overall percentage of Salmonella isolated from ducks in Assiut governorate, Egypt as 16.6% and S. Typhimurium and S. Infantis were recorded as circulating serotypes among duck farms in Assiut. Abdelaziz et al., (2020) revealed that Salmonella isolation from duckling farms at Qaluobia, Egypt, reach 14.9%. On the other side, Abu-Zaid, (2014) isolated Salmonella from fecal samples collected from healthy and diseased birds with 12%. Also Osman et al., (2014) isolated Salmonella (S. Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, S. Virchow and S. Shubra) from domestic ducklings in Egypt with an incidence of (12%). Elgohary et al., (2017) recovered Salmonella from diarrheic ducks with an incidence of 5.5% (6.15% from young ducks and 4.28% from adult ducks) and from slaughtered ducks with an incidence of 3.33% whereas S. Typhimurium, S. Infants, S.Virchow were isolated from adult ducks, S. Typhimurium, S. Agona, S. Kentucky, S. Infants, S. Virchow and S. Longhorn were isolated from young ducks and S. Kentucky and S. Typhimurium were detected from slaughtered ducks. However in Dakahlia Governorate (Egypt), Salmonella was recovered from ducks with an incidence of 7% and four serotypes were detected (S. Enteritidis, S. Typhimurium, S. Inganda and S. Kentucky) (Hassan et al., 2019). Also in a study conducted by Abou Zeid et al., (2020), Salmonella was isolated from diseased ducklings in Kafr El Sheikh, Egypt with a percentage of 7% and the reported serotypes were S. Salamae, S. Miami, S. Kentucky, S. Paratyphi A and S. Magherafelt. Elgohary et al. (2017) reported that S. Kentuky is the most prevalent serotype in slaughtered ducks and diarrheic young duckling. On another side El-nabarawy et al., 2020 isolated Salmonella from duck farms with a percentage of 4% and noticed that the litter of the poultry farms that used as a fertilizer in fish farms thus integrated fish-duck farming is common in some areas of Egypt. They explained that Salmonella pathogen may be found in the poultry litter and can contaminate fish ponds and infecting duck farms. Meanwhile in Ismailia Governorate (Egypt) Eid et al., (2019) isolated S. Typhimurium from diseased ducks with an incidence of (2.8%). In laying ducks farms located in Qaluobia governorate, Egypt. S. Typhimurium was isolated with 2% from spleen, liver, oviducts, ovaries and intestine (Abd El Tawab et al., 2018). Also, in Qaluobia Governorate Abd El Tawab et al., (2020) isolated S. Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis and S. Blegdam from commercial duckling farms located at Qaluobia Governorate. Some studies performed by Abd El-Tawab et al., (2020) and El shabrawy et al., (2021) reported that S. Typhimurium was the predominant serotype that isolated from the Egyptian ducks and these results were in contrast to Enany et al., (2018) who stated that S. Ruzizi, S. Give and S. Enteritidis isolated from local duckling with an incidence of 0.5% for each. The variation in salmonella isolation rates in different localities may be attributed to the immunity of ducklings and the variations in hygienic measures degrees in the farms. Moreover, The differences in serotypes were due to the fact that the distribution of the most common Salmonella serotypes is largely determined by geographical factors that change over time (Huehn et al., 2010), and may be related to sampling methods and isolation techniques (Vanantwerpen et al., 2016), despite the fact that several serotypes are consistently detected at a high rate around the world (Gast, 2007).
Antimicrobial susceptibility and multi-drug resistance in duck farms Antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella enterica has a significant public health importance all over the world (Tang et al., 2022). The expanded misuse of antibiotics in both public and veterinary medicine has prompted to the rise of antibiotic resistance and as an outcome represents a serious risk to public health safety, However, the use of antibiotics together with the improvement of sanitation and hygiene in addition to immunization and proper nutrition has given significant advantages in human life expectancy (WHO, 2002). Salmonella isolated from ducks showed complete resistance to amoxicillin (100%), cephradine, streptomycin (60%), colistin sulfate (80%), chloramphenicol (33.3%), neomycin and ampicillin (26.7% of each) (Khalifa et al., 2021). Hassan et al., (2019) recorded moderate sensitivity to norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin in addition to high resistance to ampicillin and amoxicillin in Salmonella isolated from ducks in Egypt. Another research study performed in Egypt recorded resistance of S. Typhimurium to ampicillin, doxycycline, colistin, gentamycin and neomycin (Abdeltawab et al., 2018). Meanwhile antibiotic resistances of Salmonella isolated from pekin duck farm were recorded to penicillin, ampicillin and doxycycline (Badr and Nasef, 2016). The isolated S. Typhimurium from diseased ducks in Egypt exhibited resistance to erythromycin and amoxicillin (Eid et al., 2019). Salmonella isolates recorded from ducklings in Kafr El Sheikh, Egypt were highly resistant to norfloxacin (90%), followed by ciprocin, flumox and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (70% for each) but showed 100% sensitive to amikacin followed by gentamicin and sulphamethoxazole/ trimethoprim (50% for each) (Abou Zeid et al., (2020). Abdelaziz et al., (2020) found that the antibiotic sensitivity tests for the isolated Salmonella strains showed multiple antibiotic resistances to oxytetracycline; amoxicillin; ampicillin; streptomycin; erythromycin and trimethoprim/ sulphamethoxazol while gentamycin, norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin were the most effective antibiotics and can be used for treatment of Salmonellosis in duck farms. In contrary to these results El-shabrawy et al., (2021) found that Salmonella isolates displayed high resistance rate to tetracycline (85%), amikacin and sulphamethoxazole/ trimethoprim (62.8% for each) and ampicillin (51.4%). Also, El- Gaos et al., (2020) detected high resistance to streptomycin (100%), lincomycin (88%) and erythromycin (82%) and the lowest resistances were against doxycycline (41%), flumequine (35%), norfloxacin (18%), ciprofloxxacin and colistin (6% for each).
Different alternative therapy to antimicrobial agents For the control and treatment of Salmonella, antimicrobials usage is important. However, multidrug-resistant Salmonella has emerged and lead to treatment failure (Gong et al., 2013). Antimicrobial therapy is the first choice of treat bacterial infection; however, the misuse of antibiotics in both human and animal field resulted in the problem of antimicrobial resistance. It has been predicted that by 2050, antibiotic-resistant pathogens will cause around 10 million deaths worldwide (Castro-Vargas et al., 2020). For many years, antibiotics have been utilized as growth promoters which help the birds to develop their immune systems. Antibiotics usage may cause bacterial resistance. The use of antibiotics has been reduced and replaced with the dietary supplements as prebiotics and/or probiotic that enhance growth and modulate the immunity (Al-Khalaifah, 2018). Antibiotic use in poultry industry was decreased due to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Alternative treatments have been developed to overcome these challenges and provide safe, inexpensive, and organic poultry meat. Prebiotics, probiotics, symbiotics, essential oils, cinnamaldehyde, organic acids, nanoparticles, chitosan and vaccines are considered as available antibiotic alternatives that have shown promising results in the control and prevention of avian Salmonellosis, ensuring strategies for control and prevention of avian Salmonellosis in either developing or developed countries and providing safe and liable poultry meat for human consumption and filling the meat gap and deficit as a source of protein (El-Saadony et al., 2022). Non antibiotic solutions have been researched in recent years with an emphasis on feeding- based tactics to decrease or manage Salmonella infections in poultry farm Adhikari et al., (2018) housed 60–65 w old white Leghorn hens with a supplemented with 0.1% of the prebiotic (FOS) and challenged against a nalidixic acid-resistant S. Enteritidis strain (2.4 × 108 CFU), the results revealed reduction of fecal shedding of S. Enteritidis numbers and increased TLR-4, IFN γ, and IgA expression. On other side Khan and Chousalkar, (2020) allocated hens on floor pens and supplemented with the probiotic combination (1 g/kg of feed) to be challenged against S. Typhimurium(106 CFU/mL) , Probiotic supplementation (Bacillus subtilis DSM 32324, Bacillus subtilis DSM 32325, and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens) decreased Salmonella counts in feces. One of the most effective substances against Salmonella isolated from ducks was lactic acid prebiotic which inhibited Salmonella growth in- vitro at a concentration of 0.5% (Hassan et al., 2019). Probiotics have the ability to prevent the colonization of S. Typhimurium in the intestinal tract of chickens by the mechanism of competitive exclusion (El-Sharkawy et al., 2020). On another side, the reduction of Salmonellosis in chicks was achieved by combining organic acid mixture and a Lactobacillus-based probiotic culture (Wolfenden et al., 2007). A study conducted by Abd El-Ghany et al., (2012) mentioned the role of the double doses application of autogenous S. Enteritidis bacterin and the probiotic in the prevention of S. Enteritidis in chickens. Iwi´nski et al., (2022) reported antibacterial effects of phytobiotics mixture against S. Enteritidis, S. Typhimurium and S. Kentucky. New technique using chitosan-nanoparticle vaccine can induce a specific immunity against Salmonella and reduce its cecal colonization in broiler (Acevedo-Villanueva et al., 2020). A research study performed by Abou Elez et al., (2021) revealed the potential antimicrobial activity of the biosynthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) against multidrug resistant S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis. Also, bacteriophage therapy considered as a potential approach to control bacterial infections. The phage therapy has reduced side effects in comparison with antibiotics and it has the ability to control the colonization of Salmonella in a short period (Nabil et al., 2018). Salmonella control measures According to the incidence of isolation and according to high percent of antimicrobial resistance study conduct by Adel et al., (2023) survey for the evaluation of biosecurity practices at small-scale commercial duck farms in and around two districts of Qalyoubia, Egypt, based on a mini-survey conducted from March to September 2021, Organs from deceased and diseased ducks, such as the liver, spleen, kidney, intestine, tongue, trachea, heart, and lung, have been taken from each farm and examined bacteriologically. A proposed questionnaire was created to gather information regarding the biosecurity measures from farm managers, owners, veterinarians, and employees, as well as researcher’s observations, A questionnaire sheet with 30 implementation-related biosecurity measures was included (Supplementary data). These items were divided into three major groups. Farms with ratings above 50% had high biosecurity, while those with values below 50% had low biosecurity. The findings showed a deficiency in the application of some crucial biosecurity measures. According to biosecurity, the rate of bacterial isolation varies from farm to farm. In all the farms included in this study, the most pervasive deficiency was the absence of a mechanism for disinfecting the water. A significant factor in lowering disease spread through farming is water sanitation. Water sanitation issues were often noted in farms housing various species in Egypt. Additionally, the findings of this mini-survey study revealed a gap in the implementation of personal biosecurity measures and advocated for a strict biosecurity implementation strategy to lower mixed infections. Also it offers a biosecurity framework for small-scale duck production that may be applied to later research and risk evaluations about the introduction and spread of infectious diseases. The study suggested strengthening biosecurity procedures in duck farms and making an effort to close the knowledge and practice gap among farmers by increasing national farmer, breeder and workers awareness through radio, television programming, training sessions, and official interactions, also registrations and licenses issued for the establishment of duck farms should be examined with a focus on the application of biosecurity regulations. Conclusion Salmonella is one of the most important pathogen facing duck farms. It produces higher morbidity and mortality rates and considered as main cause of economic losses. From the recorded data in this review, the incidences of Salmonella isolation from ducks in Egypt were ranged from 0.5% to 85.5% and the most isolated serotype was S. Typhimurium. The higher antibiotic resistances were recorded against amoxicillin, cephradine, colistin sulfate, ampicillin, tetracycline, streptomycin, lincomycin and erythromycin. Prevention and control measure should be implemented to overcome salmonellosis in duck farms in addition to find out alternatives to antibiotics to solve the difficulties in the treatment of antibiotic resistance. Strength regulations in the uses of antimicrobial agents should be applied to overcome the resistance problems. Biosecurity programs should be implemented to control the Salmonella infections. | ||||
References | ||||
Abd El Tawab AA, Maarouf AA, El Hofy FI, Abd El-Ghaffar IM. 2020. Bacteriological and molecular studies on Salmonella isolated from duckling farms at Kaliobia, Egypt. BVMJ 39 (1):169-174.
Abdeltawab A A, El- Nahas, E M, Askora A A, Abdelaziz H S. 2018. Bacteriological characterization of Salmonella species isolated from laying ducks. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal, 34 (1):404 – 412.
Abd El-Ghany WA, El-Shafii SSA, Hatem ME, Dawood RE. 2012. A Trial to Prevent Salmonella Enteritidis Infection in Broiler Chickens Using Autogenous Bacterin Compared with Probiotic Preparation. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4 (5), 91- 108.
Abdelaziz I S, El-Tawab A, Awad A, Maarouf A A, Elhofy F I. 2020. Bacteriological and molecular studies on Salmonella isolated from duckling farms at Kaliobia, Egypt. Benha veterinary medical journal, 39(1), 169-174.
Abd-El-Rahman, Mahmoud A, Moussa HMM .2000. Bacteriological and histopathological studies on Salmonella isolates from ducks in North Sinai. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 78(1):15-24. Available at: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20013148120
Abou Elez RMM, Elsohaby I, El-Gazzar N, Tolba HMM, Abdelfatah EN, Abdellatif SS, Mesalam AA, Tahoun ABMB. 2021. Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium Isolated from Laying Hens, Table Eggs, and Humans with Respect to Antimicrobial Activity of Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles. Animals 2021, 11, 3554. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ani11123554.
Abu-Zaid K. F. 2014. A Bacteriological study on Salmonella in ducks. 1st Scientific Conference of Food Safety and Technology 19-25.
Acevedo-Villanueva KY, Lester B, Renu S, Han Y, Shanmugasundaram R, Gourapura R, Selvaraj R. 2020. Efficacy of chitosan-based nanoparticle vaccine administered to broiler birds challenged with Salmonella. PLoS ONE 15(4): e0231998.
Adel A, El-Sayed H, Samir A, Abdelaty MA, Hamed EA, Roshdy H. 2023. A cross-sectional survey for the assessment of biosecurity measures in small-scale duck farms in Qalyoubia, Egypt: Comprehensive evaluation and procedural recommendations. Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916
Adhikari P, Cosby DE, Cox NA, Franca MS, Williams SM, Gogal RM, Ritz CW, Kim WK. 2018. Effect of dietary fructooligosaccharide supplementation on internal organs Salmonella colonization, immune response, ileal morphology, and ileal immunohistochemistry in laying hens challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis. Poult. Sci. 2018;97:2525–2533. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey101.
Al-Khalaifah H S. 2018. Immunology, health, and disease, benefits of probiotics and/or prebiotics for antibiotic-reduced poultry. Poultry Science 97:3807–3815.
Badr H, Nasef S A. 2016. Pathogenicity of Salmonella Typhimurium isolated from Pekin duck. 3rd Conf. of Sci. Assoc. of An. Health Res. Inst., 10-13/3/2016, 267-277.
Buxton A.1957. Salmonellosis in Animals. A Review Series No. 5 of the Commonwealth Bureau of Animal Health. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farham Royal. Bucks, England, 50: 1.
Castro-Vargas RE, Herrera-Sánchez MP, Rodríguez-Hernández R, Rondón-Barragán IS. 2020. Antibiotic resistance in Salmonella spp. isolated from poultry: A global overview, Veterinary World, 13(10): 2070-2084.
Eid HM, Algammal AM, Elfeil WK, Youssef FM, Harb SM, Abd-Allah EM. 2019. Prevalence, molecular typing, and antimicrobial resistance of bacterial pathogens isolated from ducks, Veterinary World, 12(5): 677-683.
El-Gaos MI, Khalil MR, Abd el-Dayem G A. 2020. Detection of some virulence genes in Salmonella species isolated from ducks and duck eggs. Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 66 No. 164, 1-9.
Elgohary A H, Abuelnaga A S, Ibrahim H S, Hedia R H, Dorgham S, Elgabry E A. 2017. Detection of virulence genes of Salmonella in diarrhoeic ducks by using Polymerase chain reaction. Egyptian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 48(1), 11-21.
El-Maghraby A S, Mwafy A, El-Sawy H, El- Sawy A. 2020. Sequencing of bcfC Gene of Salmonella Typhimurium Isolated from Ducks in Egypt. World Vet J, 10(3): 380-390
El-nabarawy AM, Shakal MA, Hegazy AM, Batikh MM. 2020. Comparative Clinicopathological Study of Salmonellosis in Integrated Fish-Duck Farming. J. World Poult. Res. 10(2S): 184-194.
El-Saadony MT, Salem HM, El-Tahan AM, Abd El-Mageed TA, Soliman SM, Khafaga AF, Swelum AA, Ahmed AE, Alshammari FA, Abd El-Hack ME. 2022. The control of poultry salmonellosis using organic agents: an updated overview. Poultry Science 101:101716.
El-Sharkawy H, Tahoun A, Rizk A M, 4 Suzuki T, Elmonir W, Nassef E, Shukry M, Germoush M O, Farrag F, Bin-Jumah M, Mahmoud A M. 2020. Evaluation of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus Probiotics as Alternative Therapy for Salmonella Typhimurium Infection in Broiler Chickens. Animals 2020, 10, 1023; doi:10.3390/ani10061023.
El-shebrawy HA, Mahros MM, Abd-Elghany SM, Elgazzar MM, Hayashidani H, Sallam KI. 2021. Prevalence and molecular characterization of multidrug resistant and β-lactamase producing Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from duck, pigeon, and quail carcasses in Mansoura, Egypt. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 149: 111834.
El-Soukkary F A, H M Mohamed, A A Dawood, S. Y. Abd-El Sayed .2005. Physico-chemical, microbiological and lipid characteristics of duck meat. Minufiya J. Agric. Res., 30: 527-548.
Enany ME, Wafaa MM, Reem MM. 2018. Comparison between different methods for detection of Salmonella species in imported and local duckling. Suez Canal Veterinary Medical Journal., 23(1): 171-180.
Food Agriculture Organization (FAO) .2017. Gateway to poultry production and products - Duck species, Rome. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/poultry-production-products/production/ poultry-species/ducks/en/
Food Agriculture Organization / World and Heath Organization FAO / WHO .1994. Bacterial food borne illness costs in USA. Collaborating center for research and training in food hygiene and zoonoses, Berlin 1987. New sletter 23: 3.
Galal A, WAH Ali, AMH Ahmed, Kh. A.A. Ali .2011. Performance and carcass characteristics of Domyati, Muscovy, Peking and Sudani duck breed. Egypt. J. Anim. 48(2):191 202.
Gast R.K. 2007. Serotype-specific and serotype-independent strategies for preharvest control of food-borne Salmonella in poultry. Avian diseases, 51(4): 817-828.
Gong J, Xu M , Zhu C, Miao J, Liu X, Xu B, Zhang J, Yu Y, Jia X. 2013. Antimicrobial resistance, presence of integrons and biofilm formation of Salmonella Pullorum isolates from eastern China (1962-2010). Avian Pathology, 42: 290–294.
Haider M, Hossain M, Hossain M, Chowdhury E, Das P, Hossain M. 2004. Isolation and characterization of Enterobacteria Associated with Health and Disease in Sonali Chickens. Bangalladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2 (1):15 – 21.
Hassan HM, Tawakol MM, Nabil NM. 2019. Antibacterial effect of lactic acid on multidrug resistant Salmonella isolated from ducks. Animal Health Research Journal, 7 (4): 11-20.
Huehn S, La Ragione RM, Anjum M, Saunders M, Woodward M J, Bunge C, Beutlich J. 2010. Virulotyping and antimicrobial resistance typing of Salmonella enterica serovars relevant to human health in Europe. Foodborne pathogens and disease, 7(5): 523-535.
Igbinosa IH, Amolo CN, Beshiru A, Akinnibosun O, Ogofure AG, El-Ashker M, Gwida M, Okoh A I, Igbinosa, E O. 2023. Identification and characterization of MDR virulent Salmonella spp isolated from smallholder poultry production environment in Edo and Delta States, Nigeria. PLoS ONE 18(2): e0281329.
Iwi´nski H, Wódz K, Chodkowska K, Nowak T, Ró˙za´nski, H. 2022. In Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effect of Phytobiotics Mixture on Salmonella spp. Isolated from Chicken Broiler. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ antibiotics11070868.
Khalifa Z K M, Ibrahim A A, Abd El-Motelib, T Y, Abd El-Aziz, A M. 2021. Molecular Characterization of Antibacterial Resistance Genes of Salmonella In Ducks. Assiut Vet. Med. J., 67 (171): 52-66.
Khan S, Chousalkar KK. 2020. Salmonella Typhimurium infection disrupts but continuous feeding of bacillus based probiotic restores gut microbiota in infected hens. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 11:1–16. doi: 10.1186/s40104-020-0433-7.
Liu LY, Lin L L, Zheng L N, Tang H, Fan X Z, Xue N G, Li M, Liu M, Li XY. 2018. Cecal microbiome profile altered by Salmonella enterica, serovar Enteritidis inoculation in chicken. Gut Pathogens. 2018; 10:14.
Nabil NM, Tawakol MM, Hassan HM. 2018. Assessing the impact of bacteriophages in the treatment of Salmonella in broiler chickens, Infection Ecology & Epidemiology, 8:1, 1539056.
Osman KM, Marouf SH, Zolnikov TR, AlAtfeehy N. 2014. Isolation and characterization of Salmonella enterica in day-old ducklings in Egypt. Pathog Glob Health. 2014 Jan; 108(1): 37–48.
Song L, Wu J, Weng K, Yao F, Vongsangnak W, Zhu G, Chen G, Zhang Y, Xu Q. 2022. The salmonella effector Hcp modulates infection response, and affects Salmonella adhesion and egg contamination incidences in ducks. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 12:948237.
Sorour HK, Badr H, Abdelaty MF, Roshdy H, Mohammed AA, AbdelRahman M AA. 2023. Virulence Range and New Pathological Pictures of Salmonella enteridits and Salmonella typhimurium Isolated from Ducklings in Experimental Infected Chicks. Journal of Applied Veterinary Sciences, 8 (1): 45-56.
Stevens MP, Humphrey TJ, Maskell DJ .2009. Molecular insights into farm animal and zoonotic Salmonella infections. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society B. London,364: 2709–2723.
Tang B, Elbediwi M, Nambiar R B, Yang H, Lin J, Yue M. 2022. Genomic Characterization of Antimicrobial-Resistant Salmonella enterica in Duck, Chicken, and Pig Farms and Retail Markets in Eastern China. Microbiol Spectr., 26; 10(5):e0125722.
Vanantwerpen G, De Zutter L, Berkvens D, Houf K. 2016. Impact of the sampling method and chilling on the Salmonella recovery from pig carcasses. International journal of food microbiology, 232: 22-25.
WHO. 2002. Antimicrobial resistance, (2002) Fact Sheet No.194ed.
Wolfenden A D, Vicente J L , Higgins J P, Andreatti Filho RL, Higgins SE, Hargis BM, Tellez G. 2007. Effect of Organic Acids and Probiotics on Salmonella Enteritidis Infection in Broiler Chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science 6 (6): 403-405, 2007.
Yu CY, Chu C, Chou SJ, Chao MR, Yeh CM, Lo DY, Su YC, Horng YM, Weng BC, Tsay JG. 2008. Comparison of the association of age with the infection of Salmonella and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in Pekin ducks and Roman geese. Poul. Sci. 2008; 87:1544–1549.
Zhao X, Li W, Hou S, Wang Y, Wang S, Gao J, Zhang R, Jiang S, Zhu Y. 2022. Epidemiological investigation on drug resistance of Salmonella isolates from duck breeding farms in Shandong Province and surrounding areas, China. 2022 Poultry Science 101:101961. | ||||
Statistics Article View: 273 PDF Download: 83 |
||||