STUDIES ON SOME PARAMETERS OF IMMUNE RESPONSE OF CHICKENS VACCINATED AGAINST ILT BY DIFFERENT ROUTES.
F, E., FAKAR, Z., A, S., A, K. (1997). STUDIES ON SOME PARAMETERS OF IMMUNE RESPONSE OF CHICKENS VACCINATED AGAINST ILT BY DIFFERENT ROUTES.. EKB Journal Management System, 45(3), 279-286. doi: 10.21608/vmjg.1997.378350
EL-KADY F; ZOUEL FAKAR; SAHAR A; KUTKAT A. "STUDIES ON SOME PARAMETERS OF IMMUNE RESPONSE OF CHICKENS VACCINATED AGAINST ILT BY DIFFERENT ROUTES.". EKB Journal Management System, 45, 3, 1997, 279-286. doi: 10.21608/vmjg.1997.378350
F, E., FAKAR, Z., A, S., A, K. (1997). 'STUDIES ON SOME PARAMETERS OF IMMUNE RESPONSE OF CHICKENS VACCINATED AGAINST ILT BY DIFFERENT ROUTES.', EKB Journal Management System, 45(3), pp. 279-286. doi: 10.21608/vmjg.1997.378350
F, E., FAKAR, Z., A, S., A, K. STUDIES ON SOME PARAMETERS OF IMMUNE RESPONSE OF CHICKENS VACCINATED AGAINST ILT BY DIFFERENT ROUTES.. EKB Journal Management System, 1997; 45(3): 279-286. doi: 10.21608/vmjg.1997.378350

STUDIES ON SOME PARAMETERS OF IMMUNE RESPONSE OF CHICKENS VACCINATED AGAINST ILT BY DIFFERENT ROUTES.

Veterinary Medical Journal (Giza)
Volume 45, Issue 3, July 1997, Page 279-286  XML PDF (4.67 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/vmjg.1997.378350
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
EL-KADY F1; ZOUEL FAKAR2; SAHAR A2; KUTKAT A3
1Dept. of poultry dis., Fac. of Vet. Med., Cairo Univ. (Beni-Suef branch)
2Dept. of poultry dis., Fac. of Vet. Med., Cairo Univ.
3National Research Center, Dokki, Cairo.
Abstract
The immune response against ILT vaccination taking, different routes (intraocular, spray, dipping —_al., 1983).
id drinking water) was evaluated. The criteria of evaluation depended on quantitative agar gel recipitation test (QAGPT), counter immunoelctrophoreasis (QCIE), lymphocyte transformation (LT) test and protection against challenge of vaccinated and control groups. The results indicated that no significant difference between different vaccinated group either by QAGPT nor QCIE while revealed significant difference between different vaccinated group on the following descending order intraocular, spray, drinkng water and dipping route. Results of challenge revelaed maximum protection (90%) in occular instillation and spray procedures (inspite of adverse post vaccination reaction was recorded in spray vaccination) followed by drinking water jute (80%) while dipping and non vaccinated drinking water groups gave 40% and 20% respectively. 
Statistics
Article View: 69
PDF Download: 34