Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Device-Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep-Bite; Pain and Oral Hygiene Evaluation | ||||
| Ain Shams Dental Journal | ||||
| Volume 35, Issue 3, September 2024, Page 353-362 PDF (1.22 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Consort randomized clinical trials (RCT) | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/asdj.2024.290609.1288 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Hager Mohammed Younos  1; Ahmed El-sayed Salama2; Mohsena Abdarrazik 3
| ||||
| 1Dentist at Ministry of Health. MSc Student in the Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Professor at Orthodontics Department Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al Azhar University, Egypt | ||||
| 3Orthodontic Lecturer, Faculty of Dental Medicine For Girls, Al Azhar University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Hager M. Younos1,2, Ahmed E. Salama3, Mohsena A. Abdarrazik4 Aim: This aimed to evaluate the pain sensation and the oral hygiene during the treatment of anterior deep bite cases with tooth-borne versus Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs). Materials and Methods: The sample included sixteen patients with age (15 - 20) years old. They were randomly allocated into two groups, each with eight subjects. Group A a tooth born intrusion used Connecticut Intrusion Arch (CIA) for the maxillary incisor intrusion, and in Group B TADs intrusion by mini-screws were used. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used for pain evaluation. The Plaque (PI) and Gingival (GI) Indices used to evaluate oral hygiene. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding age, gender, overbite, ANB and PI to assure the consistency of baseline characteristics. Regarding the pain evaluation, the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P=0.018), in group A"CIA" recorded a mean (0.50±.93) and the median value (0), while in group B "TADs" recorded a mean (3.00±2.27) and a median (3). Regarding GI, group B "TADs" recorded a higher mean (0.50±0.53) and median value (0.5), in comparison to Group A"CIA" which recorded a mean (0±0) and a median (0) which was statistically significant difference. Conclusion: There was good oral hygiene maintenance for both systems. However, the pain scale and GI were higher in group B "TADs" causing clinical discomfort and less tolerance in comparison to group A "CIA". | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Deep overbite; Intrusive arch; Mini-screw; oral health; pain | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 245 PDF Download: 207 |
||||
