Comparative study between Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block with Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetic in Laparoscopic Upper abdominal Surgery. | ||
| Minia Journal of Medical Research | ||
| Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 21 October 2024 | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2024.325332.1809 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Kerolis Aziz Shafik* 1; Ibrahim Talaat Ibrahim2; Khaled Ahmed Abdou3; Mohamed Abd el Razek Abd el Hakeem4 | ||
| 1Faculty of medicine | ||
| 2Anesthesia and ICU department, Minia University | ||
| 3Anesthesiology and ICU, faculty of medicine, Minia university, Minia, Minia | ||
| 4Clinical pathology department, Faculty of medicine, Minia Univerisity | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Background:Abdominal surgeries have been shifted from open surgeries to laparoscopic techniques in the last few decades.This, led to development of new local or regional analgesic techniques for postoperative pain control. Objectives:To compare between the efficacy of ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) and erector spinae plane block (ESP) with dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetic for postoperative pain relief in adult patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgeries . Patients and methods: The study compared four groups of patients who underwent upper abdominal procedures.In the first group,an ultrasound-guided TAP block was performed posterior to the mid-axillary line with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side. In the second group,an ultrasound-guided ES block was performed at T7 level with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side. In the third group, an ultrasound-guided TAP block was performed posterior to the mid-axillary line with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine on each side. Results: The groups B and D showed significantly shorter anesthetic and mobilization times compared to the other groups, despite not significantly different demographic data,duration of surgey, and incidence of complications. However,group D had a noticeably lower visual analogue scale and plolonged first analgesic request, indicating a potential difference in patient outcomes. Conclusion:Compared to the TAP block,the ESP block has more analgesic,provides longer-lasting postoperative pain relief, delays the time to initial necessity for analgesia, provide early mobilization and minimizes opioid intake;hence,it may be employed in multimodal analgesia and opioid sparing regimes after upper abdominal procedures. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Transversus abdominis plane block; erector spinae plane block; dexmedetomidine; abdominal surgeries | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 148 |
||
