Macintosh laryngoscope versus Bonfils Intubation Endoscopes in endotracheal intubation: Hemodynamic, intra-ocular pressure and serum catecholamine responses | ||||
| Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia | ||||
| Volume 29, Issue 1, January 2013, Page 67-70 PDF (348.96 K) | ||||
| DOI: 10.1016/j.egja.2012.08.006 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Sameh H. Ghoneim; Mohamad M. Sadek | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Objective One of the alternative methods in managing patients for endo-tracheal intubation is the Bonfils fiberscope. We studied the efficacy of Bonfils fiberscope in comparison to the classical laryngoscope with Macintosh blade inhemodynamic, serum catecholamine and intra-ocular pressure responses. Methods In a prospective, randomized trial 40 patients ASA I or II aged ⩾18 years scheduled for gynecological, urinary and lower abdominal procedures in supine position were randomly allocated to one of two groups; 20 patients each; according to intubating device by using either Macintosh laryngoscope (L) group or Bonfils Intubation Endoscopes (B) group. Pre-induction (baseline) and pre-insertion values of HR, MAP, IOP and blood samples for catecholamine level were recorded and repeated at 1, 3, and 5 min after intubation. Results There was significant increase in HR, MAP, IOP and catecholamine level in L group at 1, 3, and 5 min after intubation. Conclusion Bonfils laryngoscope had superiority over Macintosh as a method of intubation in situations where minimal changes in hemodynamic, catecholamine level and intraocular pressure are desirable. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Laryngoscope; Bonfils; hemodynamic; Serum catecholamine; intra-ocular pressure | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 41 PDF Download: 21 |
||||
