A randomized comparative study between selective walking spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia for anorectal surgeries in outpatient settings | ||
| Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia | ||
| Volume 29, Issue 2, April 2013, Pages 97-101 PDF (305.93 K) | ||
| DOI: 10.1016/j.egja.2012.11.004 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Hossam I. Eldesuky; Mohamed Ibrahim; Ashraf Ragab | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Background Spinal anesthesia is gradually increasing in ambulatory setting. The limiting factor to the more widespread use of spinal anesthesia in the outpatient setting refers to the effect of residual block. Selective spinal anesthesia (SSA) with low dose lidocaine was compared with modern general anesthesia (GA) technique in day care anorectal surgeries. Objective Our objectives in this study was to compare SSA with propofol and fentanyl based modern GA as regard to 1 – operating conditions 2 – patients’ and surgeon’s satisfaction, 3 – intraoperative, postoperative adverse events and 4 – recovery profiles in ambulatory anorectal surgeries. Methods Prospective randomized clinical study was conducted on 60 patients undergoing elective day case anorectal surgery. The patients were randomly allocated into one of two groups (GA and SSA groups) of 30 patients each. In GA group anesthesia was induced with intravenous fentanyl (2 μg/kg) and propofol (2–3 mg/kg). Airway was secured with I-gel supraglottic airway. Anesthesia was maintained by sevoflurane 1.5–2%, nitrous oxide 60% in oxygen mixture. SSA group patients received spinal anesthesia with lidocaine 20 mg and fentanyl 25 μg to a total volume of 3 ml with sterile water for injection. Intraoperative, postoperative and home adverse events, time to ambulate, time to home discharge, patients’ and surgeon’s satisfactions were statistically compared between both groups. Results Both anesthetic techniques showed acceptable operating conditions and high rate of patients’ satisfaction. Low pain intensity, shorter time to ambulate and home discharge in SSA compared to GA with a value < 0.001. Intraoperative hemodynamic stability was reported in both groups. No major postoperative or home adverse events in both groups. Conclusions SSA with low dose lidocaine may be suitable alternative and competitive for modern GA in ambulatory anorectal surgery. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Ambulatory; anorectal; Lidocaine; Selective spinal anesthesia | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 41 PDF Download: 18 |
||
