Comparative study between cement retained and screw retained implant prosthesis radiographically, clinically and biochemical levels of IL-1β and MMP-9 in PICF | ||||
| Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal | ||||
| Volume 7, Issue 2, October 2024, Page 223-233 PDF (2.81 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/aadj.2024.393575 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
ibrahim hammad ibrahim  1; Mahmoud Mohammed Mahmoud2; Mohamed Foad Edrees2; Mahmoud Ahmed Mizar2
| ||||
| 1Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Dental Radiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut branch, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Dental Radiology. Faculty of Dental Medicine Al-Azhar University (Assiut- Branch), Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Aim: Aim of this study was to compare between cement retained versus screw retained prothetheis on dental implant. Subjects and Methods: Eleven patients with 22 missing teeth were randomly divided into two groups. Group (I) 11 sites with single missed tooth received an implant then cement retained prosthesis. Group (II) 11 sites with single missed tooth received an implant then a screw retained prosthesis. Clinical and biochemical parameters were taken at baseline 1 and 3 months while radiographic parameters were taken at baseline, 1 and 6 months. Results: both groups showed a non-significant difference in mPI, mBI , PIPD and BD. Cement retained group showed higher bone loss than screw retained (p=0.002) (p<0.001) respectively. IL-1β and MMP-9 showed increased expression in peri-implant crevicular fluid around cement retained more than screw retained prosthesis. Conclusion: screw-retained implant prothehesis gives better result from biological point of view than cement-retained implant prosthesis. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Cement retained; Screw retained; IL-1β; MMP-9; Dental implant | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 126 PDF Download: 92 |
||||
