الاستراتيجيات التفاعلية في الكتـابة الأكاديمية: استكشـاف التحوط والتعزيز في الأوراق البحثية بين التخصصات الإنسانية والعلمية،دراسة تحليلية مقارنة

المراجع:

Al-Ghoweri, H. A., & Al Kayed, M. M. (2019). A comparative study of hedges and boosters in English and Jordanian Arabic: Economic newspaper articles as a case study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(1), 52.

Al-Mudhaffari, M., Hussin, S., & HoAbdullah, I. (2020). Interactional Strategies in L2 Writing: An Exploration of Hedging and Boosting Strategies in Applied Linguistics Research Articles. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies (IJAES), 20(1).

Altman, D.G. (1999). Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London.

alilifar, A., & Alipour, M. (2007). How Explicit Instruction Makes a Difference: Metadiscourse Markers and EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension Skill. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 38(1), 35–52.

 

Björk, L., Bräuer, G., Rienecker, L., & Jörgensen, P.S. (2003). Teaching Academic Writing in European Higher Education: An Introduction. In: Björk, L., Bräuer, G.

Bloor, M., & Bloor, T. (1991). Cultural expectations and socio-pragmatic failure in academic writing. In A. Adams, B. Heaton, & P. Howarth (Eds.), Socio-Cultural Issues in English for Academic Purposes.

Bouchemet, A. (2019). Interactional Metadiscourse in Applied Linguistics Master theses: A Corpus Based Comparative Study. 57–70.

Cao, F., & Hu, G. (2014). Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences. Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 15-31.‏

ÇAPAR, M. (2014). A STUDY ON INTERACTIONAL METADISCOURSE MARKERS IN RESEARCH ARTICLES.

Cheng, X., & Steffensen, M. (1996). Metadiscourse: a technique for improving student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 30(2), 149-81.

Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second-Language Writing. Cambridge University Press.

Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Esfandiari, R., Allaf-Akbary, O. (2022). Metadiscursive Features in Research Articles: The Role of Stimulated Recall. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 14(29), 245-263.

Ghadyani, F., & Tahririan, M. H. (2015). Interactive markers in medical research articles written by Iranian and native authors of ISI and non-ISI medical journals: a contrastive metadiscourse analysis of method section. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(2), 309.‏

Hinkel, E. (2003). Simplicity Without Elegance: Features of Sentences in L1 and L2 Academic Texts. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 275-301.

Hinkel, E. (2005). Hedging, Inflating, and Persuading in L2 Academic Writing. Applied Language Learning, 15(1), 29-53.

Holmes, J. (1982). Expressing Doubt and Certainty in English. RELC Journal, 13(2), 9-28.

Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (1996). Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication, 13(2), 251-281.

Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging, and the negotiation of academic knowledge. TEXT, 18(3), 349-382.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Hyland, K. (2008). Disciplinary voices. English Text Construction, 1(1), 5–22.

Hyland, K. (2013). Writing in the university: Education, knowledge, and reputation. Language Teaching, 46(1), 53-70. doi:10.1017/S0261444811000036.

Hyland, K. (2019). Academic interaction: Where’s it all going? Studies in Higher Education, 44(8), 1345-1357.

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). In This Paper We Suggest: Changing Patterns of Disciplinary Metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 18-30.

Hyland, K. &Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Science writing. In Cronin, B. (ed) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Vol 42: 297-338

Jin, X., & Shang, Y. (2016). Analyzing Metadiscourse in the English Abstracts of BA Theses. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 210-215.

Jordan, R. (1997). English for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kheryadi, A. M., & Syahid, A. H. (2022). Hedges in English and Arabic Metadiscourse Utility in Academic Writing: A Contrastive Analysis. Jurnal Al Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 14(2), 308-323.

Kim, I. H. (2017). Metadiscourse in persuasive essays by elementary students in South Korea and the US. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 5(2), 80–102.

Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.

McGrath, L., & Kuteeva, M. (2012). Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 161–173.

Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10, 1-35.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.

Sahebkheir, F., & Vosoughie, M. (2020). A Metadiscourse Analysis over Interactive VS Interactional Resources within English Academic Articles in Arts and Humanities. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 8(1), 225-245.‏

Sa’adeddin, M. A. (1989). Text development and Arabic-English negative interference. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 36-51.

Sahebkheir, F., & Vosoughie, M. (2020). A Metadiscourse Analysis over Interactive VS Interactional Resources within English Academic Articles in Arts and Humanities. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 8(1), 225-245.‏

Sinclair, J. (2005). Corpus and Text-Basic Principles in Developing Linguistic Corpora: a Guide to Good Practice, ed. M. Wynne.‏

Sultan, A. (2011). A contrastive study of metadiscourse in English and Arabic linguistics research articles. Acta Linguistica, 5(1), 28–41.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J., & Feak, C. (2005). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (2nd ed.). Tesl-EJ, The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 8(4).

Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). The New Era of Mixed Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3-7.

Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 58-78.

Vázquez Orta, I., & Giner, D. (2009). Writing with conviction: The use of boosters in modifying claims in academic writing. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 22, 219-237

Viana, V., & O'Boyle, A. (2021). Corpus linguistics for English for academic purposes. Routledge.

Williams, J. (1990). Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace.

Yagız, O., & Demir, C. (2014). Hedging strategies in academic discourse: a comparative analysis of Turkish writers and native writers of English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 260-268.

Yalavaç, Ç. (2021). Boosting and Hedging in Turkish Research Articles. [MA Thesis]. Hacettepe University Graduate School of Social Sciences.