Esthetic and Mechanical Evaluation of Calcium and Phosphate Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material and Fluoride Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material versus the Conventional Resin Composite in Proximal Carious Lesions over a Period of One Year
El-Sayed, N., El-Kady, D., ibrahim, S. (2024). Esthetic and Mechanical Evaluation of Calcium and Phosphate Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material and Fluoride Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material versus the Conventional Resin Composite in Proximal Carious Lesions over a Period of One Year. EKB Journal Management System, 6(3), 646-661. doi: 10.21608/adjc.2024.272393.1489
Nouran Osama El-Sayed; Dina Mounir El-Kady; shereen H ibrahim. "Esthetic and Mechanical Evaluation of Calcium and Phosphate Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material and Fluoride Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material versus the Conventional Resin Composite in Proximal Carious Lesions over a Period of One Year". EKB Journal Management System, 6, 3, 2024, 646-661. doi: 10.21608/adjc.2024.272393.1489
El-Sayed, N., El-Kady, D., ibrahim, S. (2024). 'Esthetic and Mechanical Evaluation of Calcium and Phosphate Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material and Fluoride Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material versus the Conventional Resin Composite in Proximal Carious Lesions over a Period of One Year', EKB Journal Management System, 6(3), pp. 646-661. doi: 10.21608/adjc.2024.272393.1489
El-Sayed, N., El-Kady, D., ibrahim, S. Esthetic and Mechanical Evaluation of Calcium and Phosphate Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material and Fluoride Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material versus the Conventional Resin Composite in Proximal Carious Lesions over a Period of One Year. EKB Journal Management System, 2024; 6(3): 646-661. doi: 10.21608/adjc.2024.272393.1489

Esthetic and Mechanical Evaluation of Calcium and Phosphate Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material and Fluoride Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material versus the Conventional Resin Composite in Proximal Carious Lesions over a Period of One Year

Advanced Dental Journal
Volume 6, Issue 3, July 2024, Page 646-661  XML PDF (802.71 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjc.2024.272393.1489
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Nouran Osama El-Sayed1; Dina Mounir El-Kady2; shereen H ibrahim email orcid 3
1Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentitistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
2Conservative Dentistry, faculty of dentistry, Cairo University,Cairo, Egypt
3Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo university, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was esthetic and mechanical evaluation of calcium and phosphate releasing and fluoride releasing hybrid restorative materials versus nanohybrid resin composite in posterior proximal carious lesions.
Materials and methods: A total of 45 participants with class II carious lesions were enrolled and randomly allocated. Lesions were randomly divided into three groups: Group 1 received ACTIVA Presto, Group 2 received GIOMER, and Group 3 received Neo Spectra ST. Under rubber dam isolation, cavities were prepared. Restorative material was placed according to the randomization sequence. Then finishing and polishing of restorations were achieved. Restorations were evaluated by using USPHS criteria at baseline, after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference among the tested materials regarding the mechanical and esthetic criteria except color match.
Conclusions: Compared to Giomer and Neo Spectra ST, ACTIVA Presto showed comparable mechanical properties but inferior esthetic properties.
Clincal Relevance: The three categories of the restorative materials have similar clinical performance in posterior teeth.
Keywords
calcium and phosphate releasing hybrid composite; fluoride releasing hybrid composite; nanohybrid composite; class II restorations; USPHS criteria
Statistics
Article View: 182
PDF Download: 132