Hyperopic Lasik Correction ,Out come ,Complication | ||
| Sohag Medical Journal | ||
| Article 26, Volume 21, Issue 3, October 2017, Pages 227-231 PDF (68.51 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/smj.2017.39648 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Ismael Abdelatif1; Zeinab Abdul Ghani Bakry1; Mohammad Hussein Mousa2; Alahmady Elsmman2 | ||
| 1Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University. | ||
| 2Department of ophthalmology, Sohag faculty of medicine, Sohag University, Sohag | ||
| Abstract | ||
| focus in a point behind the retina without accommodation. Hyperopic LASIK (H-LASIK) is performed in the form of annular ablation in the peripheral cornea to increase the steepness of central part of the cornea to achieve the desired refractive effect. Most of published studies indicate reasonable predictability for low to moderate hyperopic corrections up to +4 D in most series , but with less satisfactory results for the correction of higher order treatments(1,3,4). Aim of the work: Evaluation of the results and complications of LASIK in hypermetropic patients. Patient and Methods: cross-sectional data analysis of consecutive Retrospective treated 100 eyes from 50 consecutive hyperopic patients were analyzed. Excimer ablation for all eyes was performed using a mechanical microkeratome ( Moria) and an Allegretto excimer laser platform. the data was analyzed according to refractive outcome in terms of refractive predictability, efficacy, and safety. Results: . More than 90% of the eyes (90 eyes) achieved a postoperative CDVA equal to the preoperative CDVA, No eye lost more than 1 lines of CDVA ,4 eyes gained 1or more line more than CDVA | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Hypermetropia –Pentacam; Pachymetry – Keratometry | ||
|
Supplementary Files
|
||
| References | ||
|
.Rojas MC, Haw WW, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement for consecutive hyperopia after myopic over correction.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:37-43.
2. Hersh PS, Fry KL, et al. Incidence and associations of retreatment after LASIK.Ophthalmology.2003;110:748-754.
3. Lyle WA, Jin GJ. Laser in situ keratomileusis for consecutive hyperopia after myopic LASIK and radial keratotomy.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:879-888.
4. Jacobs JM, Sanderson MC, et al. Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis to treat overcorrected myopic LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg.2001;27:389-395.
5. Mulhern MG, Condon PI, et al. Myopic and hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis retreatments: indications, techniques, limitations, and results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1278-1287.
6. Cobo-Soriano R, Llovet F, et al. Factors that influence outcomes of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg.2002;28:1530-1538.
7. Peters NT, Iskander NG, Gimbel HV. Minimizing the risk of recutting with a Hansatome over an existing Automated Corneal Shaper flap for hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement
8. D. Zadok, F. Raifkup,D.Landau, et al. “Long-term evaluation of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 2181–2188,2003.
9. F. Llovet, A. Galal, et al. and J. Baviera, “One-year results of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1156–1165, 2009.
10. G. O. Waring III, B. Fant, et al., “Laser in situ keratomileusis for spherical hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism using the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 123–136, 2008.
11. J. Ali´o, A. Galal, et al “Hyperopic LASIK with Esiris/Schwind technology,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 772–781, 2006.
12. C. J. Argento and M. J. Cosentino, “Comparison of optical zones in hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis: 5.9mm versus smaller optical zones,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1137–1146, 2000. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 279 PDF Download: 354 |
||
