Assessing the Level of Intelligence of New Cities as a Tool to Improve Quality of Life and Achieve Sustainability "Case Study – New Minya City"
Mohamed, F., Fawzy, A. (2025). Assessing the Level of Intelligence of New Cities as a Tool to Improve Quality of Life and Achieve Sustainability "Case Study – New Minya City". EKB Journal Management System, 5(1), 33-47. doi: 10.21608/sej.2024.331921.1068
Fatma Othman Mohamed; Amr Mohammed Fawzy. "Assessing the Level of Intelligence of New Cities as a Tool to Improve Quality of Life and Achieve Sustainability "Case Study – New Minya City"". EKB Journal Management System, 5, 1, 2025, 33-47. doi: 10.21608/sej.2024.331921.1068
Mohamed, F., Fawzy, A. (2025). 'Assessing the Level of Intelligence of New Cities as a Tool to Improve Quality of Life and Achieve Sustainability "Case Study – New Minya City"', EKB Journal Management System, 5(1), pp. 33-47. doi: 10.21608/sej.2024.331921.1068
Mohamed, F., Fawzy, A. Assessing the Level of Intelligence of New Cities as a Tool to Improve Quality of Life and Achieve Sustainability "Case Study – New Minya City". EKB Journal Management System, 2025; 5(1): 33-47. doi: 10.21608/sej.2024.331921.1068

Assessing the Level of Intelligence of New Cities as a Tool to Improve Quality of Life and Achieve Sustainability "Case Study – New Minya City"

Sohag Engineering Journal
Volume 5, Issue 1, March 2025, Page 33-47  XML PDF (663.23 K)
Document Type: Original research articles
DOI: 10.21608/sej.2024.331921.1068
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Fatma Othman Mohamed email 1; Amr Mohammed Fawzy2
1Head of Department of Architectural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Sohag University, Sohag
2Architecture Department, Faculty of Engineering, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
Abstract
In the era of the digital revolution, cities worldwide have heavily invested in smart city projects to improve sustainability and quality of life. This paper explores the concept and global standards of smart cities and their intelligence assessment tools by focusing on new cities and their potential to be transformed into smart cities. A field study was conducted on New Minya City in Egypt using one of the approved evaluation criteria. United FOR Smart, Sustainable Cities (U4SSC) was selected to develop and determine the relative weight of each of its categories. The study assessed the city's intelligence through questionnaires distributed to academics, city officials, and a representative sample of residents, covering 1% of the population. Key findings include the critical role of smart technologies in infrastructure, particularly in water, sewage, and electricity networks, which achieved the highest relative weights. Strengths identified in New Minya City include low unemployment rates and abundant public spaces, while weaknesses such as the lack of smart systems for monitoring water and electricity consumption were noted. This paper provides adjusted relative weights for the indicators, tailored for application in new Egyptian cities, offering a practical framework for advancing these cities toward sustainability and smartness. The conclusions and recommendations aim to assist policymakers and urban planners in enhancing the performance of new cities and fostering smart urban development in Egypt.
Keywords
smart cities; city intelligence indicators; city intelligence measurement standards; assessment tool
References
  1. N. D. o. Economic, World urbanization prospects: The 2003 revision vol. 216: United Nations Publications, 2014.
  2. Elmqvist, E. Andersson, N. Frantzeskaki, T. McPhearson, P. Olsson, O. Gaffney, et al., "Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century," Nature Sustainability, vol. 2, pp. 267-273, 2019/04/01 2019.
  3. David, "Environment and urbanization. The International Encyclopedia of Geography, 24 (1), 31–46," ed, 2017.
  4. Fahmy, Y. Ibrahim, E. Hanafi, and M. Barakat, "Would LEED-UHI greenery and high albedo strategies mitigate climate change at neighborhood scale in Cairo, Egypt?," Building Simulation, vol. 11, pp. 1273-1288, 2018/12/01 2018.
  5. Degbelo, C. Granell, S. Trilles, D. Bhattacharya, S. Casteleyn, and C. Kray, "Opening up smart cities: citizen-centric challenges and opportunities from GIScience," ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 5, p. 16, 2016.
  6. Kourtit and P. Nijkamp, "Big data dashboards as smart decision support tools for i-cities–An experiment on Stockholm," Land use policy, vol. 71, pp. 24-35, 2018.
  7. Manville, G. Cochrane, J. Cave, J. Millard, J. K. Pederson, R. K. Thaarup, et al., "Mapping smart cities in the EU," 2014.
  8. Sharifi, A. Dawodu, and A. Cheshmehzangi, "Neighborhood sustainability assessment tools: A review of success factors," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 293, p. 125912, 2021/04/15/ 2021.
  9. Sánchez-Corcuera, A. Nuñez-Marcos, J. Sesma-Solange, A. Bilbao-Jayo, R. Mulero, U. Zulaika, et al., "Smart cities survey: Technologies, application domains and challenges for the cities of the future," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 15, p. 1550147719853984, 2019.
  10. Monzon, "Smart cities concept and challenges: Bases for the assessment of smart city projects," in 2015 international conference on smart cities and green ICT systems (SMARTGREENS), 2015, pp. 1-11.
  11. Mohan, G. Dubey, F. Ahmed, and A. Sidhu, "Smart Cities Index: A Tool for Evaluating Cities," Punj Lloyd Institute of Infrastructure Management, Indian School of Business (ISB), 2017.
  12. Patrão, P. Moura, and A. T. d. Almeida, "Review of Smart City Assessment Tools," Smart Cities, vol. 3, pp. 1117-1132, 2020.
  13. Sharifi, "A critical review of selected smart city assessment tools and indicator sets," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 233, pp. 1269-1283, 2019/10/01/ 2019.
  14. Sharifi A, " A typology of smart city assessment tools and indicator sets, Sustainable Cities and Society," pre-proof, 2019.
  15. S. Lai, Y. Jia, Z. Dong, D. Wang, Y. Tao, Q. H. Lai, et al., "A Review of Technical Standards for Smart Cities," Clean Technologies, vol. 2, pp. 290-310, 2020.
  16. ISO37122, "sustainable cities and communities indicators for smart cities. 13.020.20. Environmental economics. Sustainability," 2019.
  17. Akande, P. Cabral, P. Gomes, and S. Casteleyn, "The Lisbon ranking for smart, sustainable cities in Europe," Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 44, pp. 475-487, 2019.
  18. Praharaj and H. Han, "Cutting through the clutter of smart city definitions: A reading into the smart city perceptions in India," City, Culture and Society, vol. 18, p. 100289, 2019/09/01/ 2019.
  19. S. Yovanof and G. N. Hazapis, "An architectural framework and enabling wireless technologies for digital cities & intelligent urban environments," Wireless personal communications, vol. 49, pp. 445-463, 2009.
  20. Asgharizadeh, M. A. Geshlajoughi, and S. S. Mirmahalleh, "Identification of the electronic city Application Obstacles in Iran," International Journal of Human and Social, pp. 15-163, 2009.
  21. Yigitcanlar, K. O’Connor, and C. Westerman, "The making of knowledge cities: Melbourne’s knowledge-based urban development experience," Cities, vol. 25, pp. 63-72, 2008.
  22. J. Palmisano, "A smarter planet: the next leadership agenda," IBM. November, vol. 6, pp. 1-8, 2008.
  23. Zuccardi Merli and E. Bonollo, "Performance measurement in the smart cities," in Smart city, ed: Springer, 2014, pp. 139-155.
  24. A., " A critical review of selected smart city assessment tools and indicator sets," Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019.
  25. Airaksinen, "Smart cities, can the performance be measured," VTT Impulse, pp. 26-33, 2016.
  26. Caird, L. Hudson, and G. Kortuem, "A tale of evaluation and reporting in UK smart cities," 2016.
  27. Fernandez-Anez, J. M. Fernández-Güell, and R. Giffinger, "Smart City implementation and discourses: An integrated conceptual model. The case of Vienna," Cities, vol. 78, pp. 4-16, 2018/08/01/ 2018.
  28. Garau and V. M. Pavan, "Evaluating urban quality: Indicators and assessment tools for smart, sustainable cities," Sustainability, vol. 10, p. 575, 2018.
  29. Giffinger, G. Haindlmaier, and H. Kramar, "The role of rankings in growing city competition," Urban research & practice, vol. 3, pp. 299-312, 2010.
  30. Giffinger, C. Fertner, H. Kramar, R. Kalasek, N. Milanović, and E. Meijers, Smart cities - Ranking of medium-sized European cities, 2007.
  31. K. Debnath, H. C. Chin, M. M. Haque, and B. Yuen, "A methodological framework for benchmarking smart transport cities," Cities, vol. 37, pp. 47-56, 2014/04/01/ 2014.
  32. Airaksinen, "Smart cities, can the performance be measured," VTT Impulse: Espoo, Finland, 2016.
  33. Akande, P. Cabral, and S. Casteleyn, "Assessing the Gap between Technology and the Environmental Sustainability of European Cities," Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 21, pp. 581-604, 2019/06/01 2019.
  34. R. and G., H., " Smart Cities Ranking: An Effective Instrument For The Positioning Of Cities?, ACE (Architecture, city, and Environment)," Journal of the center of Land Policy and valuation, Polytechnic University of Catalonia and the thematic network architecture, city, and environment, IV(12), 7-25, 2010.
  35. f. S. Sustainable, " Cities Collection Methodology for Key Performance Indicators for Smart Sustainable Cities," 2017.
  36. (2020). Citykeys. Available online: http://citykeys-project.eu.
  37. Bosch, S. Jongeneel, V. Rovers, H.-M. Neumann, M. Airaksinen, and A. Huovila, "CITYkeys indicators for smart city projects and smart cities," CITYkeys report, 2017.
  38. Huovila, M. Airaksinen, I. Pinto-Seppä, K. Piira, P. Bosch, T. Penttinen, et al., "CITYkeys smart city performance measurement system," International Journal for Housing Science and Its Applications, vol. 41, pp. 113-125, 06/01 2017.
  39. ITU-T Y, "4900/L. 1600 overview of key performance indicators in smart, sustainable cities," ITU: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
  40. (June 2016, 12 April ). ITU. Y.4901/L.1601—Key performance indicators related to information and communication technology use n smart, sustainable cities. Available: https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-L.1601-201606-I/en
  41. Joshi, S. Kale, S. Chandel, and D. K. Pal, "Likert scale: Explored and explained," British journal of applied science & technology, vol. 7, p. 396, 2015.
  42. T. Jebb, V. Ng, and L. Tay, "A review of key Likert scale development advances: 1995–2019," Frontiers in psychology, vol. 12, p. 637547, 2021.
 

Statistics
Article View: 156
PDF Download: 81