Urban Planning and Neighborhood Development As per Sustainability Certification systems: SWOT Analysis
ELDIB, H. (2025). Urban Planning and Neighborhood Development As per Sustainability Certification systems: SWOT Analysis. EKB Journal Management System, 15(2), 241-252. doi: 10.21608/idj.2024.342076.1225
HASSAN ELDIB. "Urban Planning and Neighborhood Development As per Sustainability Certification systems: SWOT Analysis". EKB Journal Management System, 15, 2, 2025, 241-252. doi: 10.21608/idj.2024.342076.1225
ELDIB, H. (2025). 'Urban Planning and Neighborhood Development As per Sustainability Certification systems: SWOT Analysis', EKB Journal Management System, 15(2), pp. 241-252. doi: 10.21608/idj.2024.342076.1225
ELDIB, H. Urban Planning and Neighborhood Development As per Sustainability Certification systems: SWOT Analysis. EKB Journal Management System, 2025; 15(2): 241-252. doi: 10.21608/idj.2024.342076.1225

Urban Planning and Neighborhood Development As per Sustainability Certification systems: SWOT Analysis

International Design Journal
Article 22, Volume 15, Issue 2 - Serial Number 66, March and April 2025, Page 241-252  XML PDF (164.83 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/idj.2024.342076.1225
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
HASSAN ELDIB email
Architecture Engineering, Faculty of Engineering ,Canadian International College
Abstract
Urban Planning and Neighborhood Development (UPND) rating systems provide a crucial role in advancing sustainable urban growth by integrating principles of smart growth, urbanism, and green building into community design. Systems like LEED for Neighborhood Development (LEED-ND), BREEAM Communities, DGNB Urban Districts and Egypt's Green Pyramids Rating System (GPRS) assess sustainability at the neighborhood scale, addressing environmental resilience, social equity, and economic vitality. Unlike building-specific rating systems, UPND systems evaluate entire neighborhoods, incorporating factors such as transportation connectivity, energy efficiency, resource management, and community well-being. The research problem is the limited effectiveness of UPND rating systems in achieving sustainable urban growth at the local level, with a particular focus on Egypt's GPRS. The research aims to adapt and enhance the GPRS framework to align with international standards while addressing Egypt's unique socio-environmental challenges. The methodology involves analyzing the criteria, frameworks, and implementation strategies of global and local UPND systems, complemented by a SWOT analysis to evaluate their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in achieving sustainability. The research ultimately contributes to the development of resilient, vibrant, and inclusive neighborhoods in Egypt, aligning local practices with global sustainability goals and offering insights into improving the effectiveness of UPND systems in diverse contexts.
Keywords
Urban Planning; Neighborhood; Sustainability; SWOT Analysis
Supplementary Files
References
  1. Attiya, E. M. E., Shebl, M. A., & Nasser, M. M. (2020). A comparative analysis of LEED and GPRS for the applicability in Egyptian office buildings. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 9(3), 123-135. https://doi.org/xx.xxx/yyyy
  2. Bahale, S., & Schuetze, T. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment Systems from the USA (LEED–ND), Germany (DGNB–UD), and India (GRIHALD). Land. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12051002
  3. Benites, H. S., Osmond, P., & Rossi, A. M. G. (2020). Developing low-carbon communities with LEED-ND and climate tools and policies in São Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 146(1), 04019025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000538
  4. BRE Global. (2017). BREEAM Communities technical manual: Reference SD202 – Issue 1.2. BRE Group. Retrieved from https://files.bregroup.com/breeam/technicalmanuals/communitiesmanual
  5. BRE Global. (2024). New construction/international/V6: Information correct as of 20th November 2024. Retrieved from https://kb.breeam.com/wp-content/plugins/breeamkb-pdf/pdf/?c=5680
  6. BRE Global. (n.d.). BREEAM Communities V6 technical manual. Retrieved from https://breeam.com/standards/communities
  7. Cease, B., Kim, H., Kim, D., Ko, Y., & Cappel, C. (2019). Barriers and incentives for sustainable urban development: An analysis of the adoption of LEED-ND projects. Journal of Environmental Management, 244, 304-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.020
  8. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen—DGNB e.V. (German Sustainable Building Council). (n.d.). Certification requirements for urban districts. Retrieved from https://www.dgnb-system.de/en/districts/certification-requirements
  9. Diaz-Sarachaga, J. M., Jato-Espino, D., & Castro-Fresno, D. (2018). Evaluation of LEED for neighborhood development and Envision rating frameworks for their implementation in poorer countries. Sustainability, 10(2), 492. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020492
  10. Hazem, N., & Fahim, I. (2021). A step forward enhancing green buildings in developing countries. Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction. https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.2021.8(1).sus-05
  11. Housing and Building National Research Center. (2011). The Green Pyramid Rating System (GPRS). Housing and Building National Research Center.
  12. Housing and Building National Research Center. (2017). The Green Pyramid Rating System (GPRS): Updates and developments. Housing and Building National Research Center.
  13. Huang, M., Tao, Y., Qiu, S., & Chang, Y. (2023). Healthy community assessment model based on the German DGNB system. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043167
  14. Ibrahim, I. (2020). Sustainable housing development: Role and significance of satisfaction aspect. City, Territory and Architecture, 7, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-020-00130-x
  15. Komeily, A., & Srinivasan, R. (2015). A need for balanced approach to neighborhood sustainability assessments: A critical review and analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society, 18, 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.05.004
  16. Li, Y., Li, S., Xia, S., Li, B., Zhang, X., Wang, B., Ye, T., & Zheng, W. (2023). A review on the policy, technology, and evaluation method of low-carbon buildings and communities. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041773
  17. Merino-Saum, A., Halla, P., Superti, V., Boesch, A., & Binder, C. R. (2020). Indicators for urban sustainability: Key lessons from a systematic analysis of 67 measurement initiatives. Ecological Indicators, 119, 106879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106879
  18. Naji, S., & Gwilliam, J. (2021). The potentials of BREEAM communities in addressing the adaptive governance in theory and practice. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01783-5
  19. Pham, D., Kim, B., Lee, J., & Ahn, Y. (2020). An investigation of the selection of LEED Version 4 credits for sustainable building projects. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207081
  20. Sharifi, A. (2016). From garden city to eco-urbanism: The quest for sustainable neighborhood development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 20, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.09.002
  21. Sharifi, A., Dawodu, A., & Cheshmehzangi, A. (2021). Neighborhood sustainability assessment tools: A review of success factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 125912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125912
  22. Szibbo, N. (2015). Assessing neighborhood livability: Evidence from LEED® for neighborhood development and New Urbanist communities. Articulo – Journal of Urban Research. https://doi.org/10.4000/articulo.3120
  23. U.S. Green Building Council. (n.d.). LEED v4.1 reference guide for neighborhood development. Retrieved from https://www.usgbc.org/leed/v41
  24. U.S. Green Building Council. (n.d.). LEED v4 reference guide for neighborhood development: Applies to new land development projects or redevelopment projects containing residential uses, nonresidential uses, or a mix. Retrieved from https://www.usgbc.org/guide/nd
Statistics
Article View: 177
PDF Download: 202