Single-session endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) vs. Two-stage Endoscopic Stone Extraction during ERCP followed by LC: a multicenter experience
Mohamed, M., R, A., Saada, A., A, M., Fouad, H., Ismail, M. (2023). Single-session endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) vs. Two-stage Endoscopic Stone Extraction during ERCP followed by LC: a multicenter experience. EKB Journal Management System, 42(3), -. doi: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_116_23
Mohamed Abdelshafy Mohamed; Asmaa Gaber R; Ahmed Saada; Mohamed Yousef A; Hesham Fayek Fouad; Mahmoud M. A. Ismail. "Single-session endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) vs. Two-stage Endoscopic Stone Extraction during ERCP followed by LC: a multicenter experience". EKB Journal Management System, 42, 3, 2023, -. doi: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_116_23
Mohamed, M., R, A., Saada, A., A, M., Fouad, H., Ismail, M. (2023). 'Single-session endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) vs. Two-stage Endoscopic Stone Extraction during ERCP followed by LC: a multicenter experience', EKB Journal Management System, 42(3), pp. -. doi: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_116_23
Mohamed, M., R, A., Saada, A., A, M., Fouad, H., Ismail, M. Single-session endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) vs. Two-stage Endoscopic Stone Extraction during ERCP followed by LC: a multicenter experience. EKB Journal Management System, 2023; 42(3): -. doi: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_116_23

Single-session endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) vs. Two-stage Endoscopic Stone Extraction during ERCP followed by LC: a multicenter experience

The Egyptian Journal of Surgery
Article 5, Volume 42, Issue 3, July 2023  XML PDF (1.85 MB)
DOI: 10.4103/ejs.ejs_116_23
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohamed Abdelshafy Mohamed1; Asmaa Gaber R1; Ahmed Saada1; Mohamed Yousef A* 1; Hesham Fayek Fouad2; Mahmoud M. A. Ismail3
1General Surgery Department, Qena Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt,
2General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt,
3Anaesthesia Department, Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt
Abstract
Background: The best way to handle gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones that are present simultaneously is up for dispute. The combination of endoscopic ERCP stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been the standard of care since the development of endoscopic and laparoscopic methods.
Objective: The current study aimed to evaluate single-stage ERCP/laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and two-stage ERCP/LC in terms of imaging frequency,
length of anesthesia, mean operating time, length of stay, and expenditures.
Patients and methods: Between June 2020 and January 2023, this multicenter retrospective comparative analysis was carried out in Qena University Hospitals, South Valley University, Qena and Assiut University Hospitals, Assiut University, Assiut. 
Results: This research covered 220 participants. At ERCP, all patients had their bile ducts cleared. Regarding baseline variables such as age, sex, abdominal pain, preoperative liver function test, bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase level, there is no difference between the two groups. The length of hospital stay varies significantly.
Conclusion: When compared with two separate procedures, single-session ERCP/LC has been safely and successfully utilized in some circumstances and is related to a shorter hospital stay, a reduced frequency of imaging, and better patient satisfaction. 
Keywords
Common bile duct stones; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; two sessions; two stages
Statistics
Article View: 73
PDF Download: 35