IMPACT OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY DURING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY & PROSTATECTOMY ON SURGICAL OUTCOMES: PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
Ismail, H., Abdelsattar, M., Elhenawy, I., Ibrahiem, J. (2025). IMPACT OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY DURING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY & PROSTATECTOMY ON SURGICAL OUTCOMES: PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY. EKB Journal Management System, 7(1), 19-20. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.353305.2070
Hazem Rashad Ismail; Mohamed Abdelsattar; Ibrahiem Moustafa Elhenawy; John Naiem Ibrahiem. "IMPACT OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY DURING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY & PROSTATECTOMY ON SURGICAL OUTCOMES: PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY". EKB Journal Management System, 7, 1, 2025, 19-20. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.353305.2070
Ismail, H., Abdelsattar, M., Elhenawy, I., Ibrahiem, J. (2025). 'IMPACT OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY DURING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY & PROSTATECTOMY ON SURGICAL OUTCOMES: PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY', EKB Journal Management System, 7(1), pp. 19-20. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.353305.2070
Ismail, H., Abdelsattar, M., Elhenawy, I., Ibrahiem, J. IMPACT OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY DURING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY & PROSTATECTOMY ON SURGICAL OUTCOMES: PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY. EKB Journal Management System, 2025; 7(1): 19-20. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.353305.2070

IMPACT OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY DURING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY & PROSTATECTOMY ON SURGICAL OUTCOMES: PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY

ALEXMED ePosters
Article 1, Volume 7, Issue 1, January 2025, Page 19-20  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.353305.2070
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Hazem Rashad Ismail1; Mohamed Abdelsattar1; Ibrahiem Moustafa Elhenawy2; John Naiem Ibrahiem email 3
1Department of Genitourinary Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria.
2Ibrahiem Moustafa Elhenawy
3Department of Genitourinary surgery , faculty of medicine , university of Alexandria
Abstract
Prostate and bladder cancer are considered as a serious health problem, where they represent the second and the seventh most commonly diagnosed cancer in the male population worldwide respectively.
Radical cystectomy and prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy operations are considered the best treatment methods for non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer and organ confined prostate cancer. Although pelvic lymphadenectomy plays a crucial role in staging and treatment of bladder and prostate cancer, there are some intraoperative complications such as increasing operative time, blood loss, vascular , neurologic injury and some postoperative complications as: lymphocele formation, lymphorrhea, prolonged drain placement with prolonged hospital stay, lymphedema and lower limb vascular compromise .
Methods used during lymphadenectomy whether clips, monopolar diathermy or ligasure can have an impact on the intraoperative and postoperative complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy in radical cystectomy and prostatectomy operations.

AIM OF THE WORK:
The aim of this work was to study the impact of different methods of lymphatic vessel sealing during pelvic lymphadenectomy (clips, diathermy and ligasure) in radical cystectomy and radical prostatectomy on surgical outcomes.
Keywords
Pelvic lymphadenectomy; different methods of pelvic lymphadenectomy; impact on surgical outcomes
Supplementary Files
Statistics
Article View: 56