Comparative Study between use of IOTA and ORADS Consensus Scores in Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses Using Ultrasound
Elsokary, H., Essmat, A., Abd El hamid Eshiba, S., Aly Omar Kolaib, N., Benjamin, L. (2025). Comparative Study between use of IOTA and ORADS Consensus Scores in Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses Using Ultrasound. EKB Journal Management System, 7(1), 30-31. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.358297.2085
Hossam Elsokary; Ahmed Abdelazem Essmat; Samar Mohamed Abd El hamid Eshiba; Nourhan Mohamed Aly Omar Kolaib; Lemalema Litanga Benjamin. "Comparative Study between use of IOTA and ORADS Consensus Scores in Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses Using Ultrasound". EKB Journal Management System, 7, 1, 2025, 30-31. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.358297.2085
Elsokary, H., Essmat, A., Abd El hamid Eshiba, S., Aly Omar Kolaib, N., Benjamin, L. (2025). 'Comparative Study between use of IOTA and ORADS Consensus Scores in Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses Using Ultrasound', EKB Journal Management System, 7(1), pp. 30-31. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.358297.2085
Elsokary, H., Essmat, A., Abd El hamid Eshiba, S., Aly Omar Kolaib, N., Benjamin, L. Comparative Study between use of IOTA and ORADS Consensus Scores in Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses Using Ultrasound. EKB Journal Management System, 2025; 7(1): 30-31. doi: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.358297.2085

Comparative Study between use of IOTA and ORADS Consensus Scores in Diagnosis of Ovarian Masses Using Ultrasound

ALEXMED ePosters
Article 1, Volume 7, Issue 1, January 2025, Page 30-31  XML
Document Type: Preliminary preprint short reports of original research
DOI: 10.21608/alexpo.2025.358297.2085
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Hossam Elsokary1; Ahmed Abdelazem Essmat1; Samar Mohamed Abd El hamid Eshiba2; Nourhan Mohamed Aly Omar Kolaib3; Lemalema Litanga Benjamin email 4
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University
2Department of Radiodiagnosis and Intervention , Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
3Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Abstract
Introduction
In general, adnexal lesions are common and usually benign. Benign ovarian tumors have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer, although they may be found incidentally during imaging for other unrelated conditions or in individuals with symptoms (such as pelvic discomfort or a palpable pelvic mass).
With a five-year survival rate of about 40%, ovarian cancer is the most aggressive gynecological cancer and is responsible for about half of all gynecological cancer-related deaths. Referral to a gynecological oncology center for additional diagnosis or staging and therapy with a multidisciplinary team is a significant factor that determines prognosis in addition to stage at diagnosis, which is the most critical determinant for survival.
Accurate description of adnexal lesions on imaging is critical to avoid unnecessary surgery for benign lesions and to refer suspicious tumors to a gynecologic oncologist. Ultrasound is considered the first choice useful imaging test for diagnosis of ovarian and adnexal masses because it is a noninvasive, widely available, inexpensive imaging technique with little risk or pain to the patient.
Keywords
IOTA; ORADS; Ovarian Masses
Supplementary Files
Statistics
Article View: 44