Hysterosalpingography (HSG) findings after different treatment modalities of tubal ectopic pregnancy. | ||||
Minia Journal of Medical Research | ||||
Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 09 February 2025 | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2025.355564.1891 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Ahmed Mohammed Ramadan ![]() | ||||
1department of obstetrics and gynecology, faculty of medicine, Minia university, Egypt | ||||
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Egypt | ||||
3Obstetrics and Gynecology, faculty of medicine, Minia university, Minia, Egypt | ||||
4Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine – Minia University, Egypt | ||||
5Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of medicine, Minia university | ||||
Abstract | ||||
ABSTRACT Objective: to assess Hysterosalpingography findings after different management modalities of tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP). Methods: the current study involved 159 patients known as cases of tubal EP between December 2020 and November 2021 and actively planned to conceive following the EP. They were divided into three groups according to type of treatment: Group A (81 cases), treated surgically; Group B (34 cases), medically managed; and Group C (44 cases), observational treatment. All patients failed to conceive subsequently subjected to hormonal profile and hysterosalpingeography (HSG). Results: Among 159 patients, 81cases (50.94%) had surgical treatment, 44 cases (27.67%) had expectant management, 34 cases (21.38%) had medical treatment. Regarding hysterosalpingography findings, the highest incidence of tubal damage was in the surgical group in the form of adhesions or block. Conclusions: The risk of tubal damage was higher in the surgically treated patients compared to other treated groups and more susceptible to tubal complications. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Keywords: Ectopic pregnancy; Hysterosalpingography; Tubal Adhesions | ||||
Statistics Article View: 90 |
||||