Chlorohexidine versus Povidine Iodine in The Prevention of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection among Critically Ill Patients
Shaaban Attia, A., Khalaf Mekdad, A., Mahfouz Shaker, N., Badway Khalaf, A., Abdelrazek Younes Elsayed, S. (2025). Chlorohexidine versus Povidine Iodine in The Prevention of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection among Critically Ill Patients. EKB Journal Management System, 16(1), 406-419. doi: 10.21608/ejhc.2025.410898
Ahmed Shaaban Attia; Ahmed Khalaf Mekdad; Noura Mahfouz Shaker; Abeer Badway Khalaf; Samar Abdelrazek Younes Elsayed. "Chlorohexidine versus Povidine Iodine in The Prevention of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection among Critically Ill Patients". EKB Journal Management System, 16, 1, 2025, 406-419. doi: 10.21608/ejhc.2025.410898
Shaaban Attia, A., Khalaf Mekdad, A., Mahfouz Shaker, N., Badway Khalaf, A., Abdelrazek Younes Elsayed, S. (2025). 'Chlorohexidine versus Povidine Iodine in The Prevention of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection among Critically Ill Patients', EKB Journal Management System, 16(1), pp. 406-419. doi: 10.21608/ejhc.2025.410898
Shaaban Attia, A., Khalaf Mekdad, A., Mahfouz Shaker, N., Badway Khalaf, A., Abdelrazek Younes Elsayed, S. Chlorohexidine versus Povidine Iodine in The Prevention of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection among Critically Ill Patients. EKB Journal Management System, 2025; 16(1): 406-419. doi: 10.21608/ejhc.2025.410898

Chlorohexidine versus Povidine Iodine in The Prevention of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection among Critically Ill Patients

Egyptian Journal of Health Care
Volume 16, Issue 1, March 2025, Page 406-419  XML PDF (237.06 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejhc.2025.410898
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ahmed Shaaban Attia1; Ahmed Khalaf Mekdad1; Noura Mahfouz Shaker2; Abeer Badway Khalaf2; Samar Abdelrazek Younes Elsayed3
1Lecturer of Critical Care and Emergency Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Helwan University
2Lecturer of Critical Care and Emergency Nursing, Medical Surgical Department Faculty of Nursing /Beni- Suef University
3Lecturer of Critical Care and Emergency Nursing, Faculty of Nursing / Damnhour University
Abstract
Background: Urinary tract infections are the most frequently occurring infections associated with healthcare in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Prolonged catheterization stands out as the primary risk factor for developing UTIs. Aim: compare chlorohexidine versus povidine iodine in the prevention of catheter associated urinary tract infection among critically ill patients. Design: Quasi experimental study was carried out at Damanhur Medical National institute, Egypt. Sample: a Purposive sample of 180 patients selected and divided equally to two groups, Group (A) used chlorhexidine gluconate, Group (B) used 10 % povidone Iodine solution in the insertion of urinary catheter. Results: Majority of the sample were male and 40% of povidine iodine group and 43.3% of chlorohexidine group were in age group from (31 < 41). Also, There was a highly statistically significant difference between the povidine iodine group and chlorohexiedene group regarding total catheter associated urinary tract infection assessment profile as chlorohexidene group is less symptoms than povidine iodine group with p-value = (0.000). Conclusion: using chlorhexidine gluconate in insertion of urinary catheter was statistically significant difference in reducing catheter associated urinary tract infection among critical patients than povidine iodine. Recommendation: Comparison between soap and Chlorohexidine in reducing Catheter associated urinary tract infection.
Keywords
Chlorohexidine; Povidine-iodine; Urinary tract Infection
Statistics
Article View: 260
PDF Download: 169