PERFORMANCE-BASED FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT APPROACHES (PROCESSES/PRODUCTS) VIA THE FLIPPED CLASSROOM MODEL TO DEVELOP LINGUISTIC SELF-EFFICACY AMONG AL-AZHAR SECONDARY STAGE STUDENTS IN NORTH SINAI | ||||
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sustainable Development | ||||
Volume 1, Issue 1, December 2024, Page 21-36 PDF (523.94 K) | ||||
Document Type: Researches | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/jesasd.2025.356154.1001 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Mohamed E.E. Abouella ![]() | ||||
1Dept. Environ. Humanities, Inst. Environ. Studies, Arish Univ., Egypt. | ||||
2Dept. Comparative Edu. and Edu. Admin., Fac. Edu., Arish Univ., Egypt. | ||||
3Dept. Curriculum, Teaching Methods and Edu. Technol., Fac. Edu., Arish Univ., Egypt. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
The research aimed at examining performance-based formative assessment approaches (Processes/Products) via the flipped classroom model and its impact on developing linguistic self-efficacy among Al-Azhar secondary stage students in North Sinai. A quasi-experimental 1×2 factorial design was employed. Independent variable was performance-based formative assessment approaches included two types approaches of performance-based formative assessment presented via flipped classroom model (processes vs. products), dependent variable was linguistic self-efficacy. The participants were 64 students (males) selected from first Secondary grade students by Al-azhar in North Sinai, were assigned to two experimental groups. The first experimental group utilized a performance-based formative assessment approach for processes; included 32 students, the second experimental group utilized performance-based formative assessment approach for Products; included 32 students. The research tool represents linguistic self-efficacy scale. The results revealed that a statistically significant difference at ≤ 0.05 between the mean scores of the two experimental groups in linguistic self-efficacy in favor of performance-based formative assessment approach for products. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Flipped Classroom; Formative Assessment Approach; Performance-Based Formative Assessment; Linguistic Self-Efficacy | ||||
Statistics Article View: 65 PDF Download: 22 |
||||