BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA CROWNS WITH BOPT AND CHANFER FINISHING LINE DESIGNS. A 1- YEAR PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL TRIAL | ||||
| Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science | ||||
| Volume 28, Issue 1, January 2025, Page 43-50 PDF (581.78 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2023.213784.1435 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Mostafa Mohammed Ahmed  1; khalid hassan2; tamer hamza3
| ||||
| 1Department of crown and bridge AlAzhar Unervisty | ||||
| 2Dean and Professor Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry (Assuit branch), Al-Azhar University. | ||||
| 3Dean and professor of prosthodontic Department Badr University in Cairo (BUC). | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Aim: The goal of this prospective 1-year clinical trial was to determine how two types of finishing line (FL) designs—biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT) and chamfer—affect the biological behavior of monolithic zirconia (M-ZrO2) crowns for anterior teeth, including their pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI). Material and Methods: Eight healthy adults over the age of 18 with a normal occlusion, healthy periodontium, and normal gingival biotypes were enrolled in this clinical trial from patients who were seeking treatment for endodontically treated anterior teeth with monolithic zirconia crowns. A split-mouth design was intended for this clinical trial. The BOPT or chamfer FL designs were used to prepare a total of 16 maxillary incisor teeth that had undergone endodontic treatment—eight in each group. At three distinct follow-up intervals (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months), the PD, CAL, PI, and GI were clinically assessed using Williams' periodontal probe in accordance with explicitly developed criteria. In order to conduct a statistical analysis, the numerical results for the PD, CAL, PI, and GI tests were gathered, confirmed for normality, and statistically analyzed using the unpaired t-test (to compare two groups) and the one-way ANOVA test (to compare various time intervals). The threshold for significance was fixed at p 0.05. Results: Regarding the biological outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences detected between the finish line configurations. Conclusions: Zirconia crowns are produced a positive biological response, regardless of the type of finish line. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Biological response; BOPT; Chamfer; Finishing line; Monolithic zirconia crowns | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 106 PDF Download: 69 |
||||
