Osseodensification versus Piezosurgery in crestal sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement | ||||
Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science | ||||
Volume 28, Issue 1, January 2025, Page 81-90 PDF (827.12 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2023.229543.1445 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Ahmed Halim Hashem ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||||
1Department of periodontology and oral medicine, Faculty of Dental medicine,Alazhar university (boys), Cairo , Egypt | ||||
2Department of periodontology and oral medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine (boys),Cairo,Egypt | ||||
3Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Diagnosis and Oral Radiology Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Cairo, Al-Azhar University | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Objective: Evaluation of implant stability, vertical and horizontal bone gain and bone density using osseodensification technique versus Piezosurgery in transcrestal maxillary sinus lifting. Subjects & Methods: Twenty-two patients were included in the study and randomly divided into 2 equal groups: Group 1: 11 patients treated by densah drills (Versah, Jackson, MI, USA) transcrestal sinus lift with bone grafting (xenograft) and implant placement. Group 2: 11 patients treated by piezoelectric transcrestal sinus lift (Piezotome; Satelec) with bone grafting (xenograft) and implant placement. CBCT radiograph was done before and after 6 months of dental implant placement. Results: Both groups showed statistically significant differences from baseline to 6 months. osseodensification showed a better technique for gaining better implant stability and bone density. Both groups showed no difference in both vertical and horizontal bone gain. Conclusion: Osseodensification and piezoelectric surgery are both effective methods for crestal sinus elevation, with higher implant stability and bone density in the osseodensification group after 6 months. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Osseodensification; Densah bur; Sinus lift; Piezosurgery | ||||
Statistics Article View: 135 PDF Download: 90 |
||||