Comparison between contrast enhanced spectral mammography BIRADS and KASIER scoring systems in characterization of breast lesions
Midan, O., Zarad, C., Hanora, M., Mekhaimer, M. (2025). Comparison between contrast enhanced spectral mammography BIRADS and KASIER scoring systems in characterization of breast lesions. EKB Journal Management System, 23(23), 44-50. doi: 10.21608/muj.2025.366705.1212
Osama Mahmoud Midan; Carmen Ali Zarad; Mohamed Ahmed Hanora; Mahmoud Ibrahim Mekhaimer. "Comparison between contrast enhanced spectral mammography BIRADS and KASIER scoring systems in characterization of breast lesions". EKB Journal Management System, 23, 23, 2025, 44-50. doi: 10.21608/muj.2025.366705.1212
Midan, O., Zarad, C., Hanora, M., Mekhaimer, M. (2025). 'Comparison between contrast enhanced spectral mammography BIRADS and KASIER scoring systems in characterization of breast lesions', EKB Journal Management System, 23(23), pp. 44-50. doi: 10.21608/muj.2025.366705.1212
Midan, O., Zarad, C., Hanora, M., Mekhaimer, M. Comparison between contrast enhanced spectral mammography BIRADS and KASIER scoring systems in characterization of breast lesions. EKB Journal Management System, 2025; 23(23): 44-50. doi: 10.21608/muj.2025.366705.1212

Comparison between contrast enhanced spectral mammography BIRADS and KASIER scoring systems in characterization of breast lesions

Medicine Updates
Volume 23, Issue 23, October 2025, Page 44-50  XML PDF (591.84 K)
Document Type: Review Article
DOI: 10.21608/muj.2025.366705.1212
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Osama Mahmoud Midan email 1; Carmen Ali Zarad2; Mohamed Ahmed Hanora3; Mahmoud Ibrahim Mekhaimer4
1Radiology resident port said university hospital
2Associate professor of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Port Said University, Egypt
3Lecturer of radiology, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology department, Faculty of Medicine, Port Said University, Port Said, Egypt.
4Lecturer of Radiology, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology department, Cairo university.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a major global health challenge, affecting millions worldwide and standing as the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women. Over the past 40 years, its incidence has steadily risen, with an annual increase of about 0.5%. Addressing this issue requires advanced diagnostic tools for accurate and timely detection.
One such innovation is contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, which produces four easily interpretable images with sensitivity comparable to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CESM is also more cost-effective and less time-consuming, making it a valuable alternative for assessing breast lesions.
This article evaluates findings from various studies comparing two scoring systems used in contrast enhanced spectral mammography: The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and the Kaiser Score. These systems aim to standardize lesion assessment and improve diagnostic accuracy. The review highlights the strengths and limitations of each approach, particularly in differentiating benign from malignant lesions.
In conclusion, the Kaiser Score demonstrates superior performance in evaluating suspicious borderline breast lesions, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies. Its ability to provide precise risk stratification makes it a valuable tool in clinical practice, enhancing patient management and minimizing invasive procedures. This underscores the importance of integrating advanced scoring systems like the Kaiser Score into breast imaging protocols for improved diagnostic outcomes.
Keywords
Contrast enhanced spectral mammography; BIRADS; Kaiser score
Statistics
Article View: 107
PDF Download: 47