Flexure Strength, Flexure Modulus and color Stability of Different Dental Resin Composites | ||||
| Sue Oral and Dental Medicine Journal | ||||
| Article 2, Volume 1, Issue 1, January 2025, Page 5-11 PDF (327.86 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/suodmj.2025.362935.1002 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
Abd Allah El-Saadany 
| ||||
| Dental Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine,Alsalam University, Tanta, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Aim of Study: Evaluation of some physicomechanical properties; color stability, flexural strength and flexure modulus of different dental resin composites. Materials and Methods: Three types of dental resin composite were used in this study; (1) Conventional nanohybrid (Grandio So, Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany), (2) Fiber reinforced bulk fill (Posterior Ever X, GC, Tokyo, Japan), (3) Conventional nanofill (Z350, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). Color stability, flexural strength and flexural modulus were tested according to ISO 4049. Highest color stability was Z350 (nanofill composite) while highst flexural strength was Ever X Posterior (fibers reinforced composite) and highest flexural modulus was GrandioSo (nanohybrid). Conclusion: Physicomechanical properties of dental resin composite are mainly influence by internal structure of composite (resin type and percentage, filler load and size, type of photoinitiator, type of saline coupling agent). ---------------------------------------------- Aim of Study: Evaluation of some physicomechanical properties; color stability, flexural strength and flexure modulus of different dental resin composites. Materials and Methods: Three types of dental resin composite were used in this study; (1) Conventional nanohybrid (Grandio So, Voco, Cuxhaven, | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| TEGDA; UDEMA; toughness; iso4049 | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 124 PDF Download: 58 |
||||
