Review of Biometric Sensors for Assessing Human Emotional Responses in Virtual Reality Architectural Studies | ||
| JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences | ||
| Article 10, Volume 53, Issue 3, May and June 2025, Pages 288-305 PDF (483.13 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.354434.1415 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Ahmed Radwan* 1; Mohammed Abdel-Sameea Eid Mohammed1; Hatem Mahmoud2 | ||
| 1Architecture Engineering Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt | ||
| 2Environmental engineering Dept., Egypt-Japan of Science and Technology, Alexanderia, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This paper presents a comprehensive review of biometric sensors used to assess architectural design’s impact on human emotional responses within Virtual Reality (VR) environments. The research integrates a Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) equipped with Electroencephalogram (EEG), Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), and Photoplethysmogram (PPG) sensors to capture real-time physiological data. These tools measure brain activity, emotional arousal, and cardiovascular responses as participants engage with virtual spaces designed to evoke varying emotional experiences. The findings emphasize the value of biometric tools in providing objective, real-time data that complement traditional subjective evaluations. This review explores the methodologies, advantages, and limitations of EEG, GSR, and PPG, while also addressing their integration within WBANs for synchronized data collection. Key applications include evaluating stress-reducing environments, stimulating spaces, and iterative design feedback. Challenges related to data accuracy, sensor synchronization, and participant variability are discussed alongside potential solutions. By bridging architecture and neuroscience, this paper highlights the potential of biometric tools in designing human-centered environments that promote well-being and enhance user experience. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Biometric Sensors; Virtual Reality (VR); Architectural Design Evaluation; Physiological Metrics; Wireless Body Area Networks (WBAN) | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] E. M. Sternberg and M. A. Wilson, “Neuroscience and Architecture: Seeking Common Ground,” Cell, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 239–242, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.012.
[2] R. S. Ulrich, “View through a window may influence recovery from surgery,” Science, vol. 224, no. 4647, 1984, doi: 10.1126/science.6143402.
[3] R. Berto, “The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness,” Behav. Sci., vol. 4, no. 4, 2014, doi: 10.3390/bs4040394.
[4] S. Collado, H. Staats, J. A. Corraliza, and T. Hartig, “Restorative Environments and Health,” 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_7.
[5] G. Franz and J. M. Wiener, “Exploring isovist-based correlates of spatial behavior and experience,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, 2005.
[6] N. K. Logothetis, “What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7197, pp. 869–878, 2008.
[7] M. Ferrari and V. Quaresima, “A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application,” Neuroimage, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 921–935, 2012.
[8] M. Hämäläinen, R. Hari, R. J. Ilmoniemi, J. Knuutila, and O. V. Lounasmaa, “Magnetoencephalography—theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 65, no. 2, p. 413, 1993.
[9] R. S. Ulrich et al., “A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design,” HERD Health Environ. Res. Des. J., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 61–125, 2008.
[10] A. S. Devlin and A. B. Arneill, “Health care environments and patient outcomes: A review of the literature,” Environ. Behav., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 665–694, 2003.
[11] A. Heydarian, J. P. Carneiro, D. Gerber, B. Becerik-Gerber, T. Hayes, and W. Wood, “Immersive virtual environments versus physical built environments: A benchmarking study for building design and user-built environment explorations,” Autom. Constr., vol. 54, pp. 116–126, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.020.
[12] M. Schweitzer, L. Gilpin, and S. Frampton, “Healing Spaces: Elements of Environmental Design That Make an Impact on Health,” J. Altern. Complement. Med., vol. 10, no. supplement 1, Art. no. supplement 1, Oct. 2004, doi: 10.1089/acm.2004.10.S-71.
[13] F. Shaffer, R. McCraty, and C. L. Zerr, “A healthy heart is not a metronome: an integrative review of the heart’s anatomy and heart rate variability,” Front. Psychol., vol. 5, p. 1040, 2014.
[14] M. Malik, “Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use: Task force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology,” Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 151–181, 1996.
[15] J. G. Allen, P. MacNaughton, U. Satish, S. Santanam, J. Vallarino, and J. D. Spengler, “Associations of cognitive function scores with carbon dioxide, ventilation, and volatile organic compound exposures in office workers: a controlled exposure study of green and conventional office environments,” Environ. Health Perspect., vol. 124, no. 6, pp. 805–812, 2016.
[16] S. Saeidi, A. Lowe, N. Johannsen, and Y. Zhu, “Application of immersive virtual environment (IVE) in occupant energy-use behavior studies using physiological responses,” in Computing in Civil Engineering 2017, 2017, pp. 381–389.
[17] I. Bower, R. Tucker, and P. G. Enticott, “Impact of built environment design on emotion measured via neurophysiological correlates and subjective indicators: A systematic review,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 66, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101344.
[18] X. Zhang, J. Du, and D. Chow, “Association between perceived indoor environmental characteristics and occupants’ mental well-being, cognitive performance, productivity, satisfaction in workplaces: A systematic review,” Build. Environ., p. 110985, 2023.
[19] A. Radwan, M. A.-S. E. Mohammed, and H. Mahmoud, “Architecture and Human Emotional Experience: A Framework for Studying Spatial Experiences: Egypt as a case study,” JES J. Eng. Sci., vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 482–497, 2024.
[20] P. Saha et al., “Novel multimodal emotion detection method using Electroencephalogram and Electrocardiogram signals,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 92, p. 106002, 2024.
[21] C. J. Beukeboom, D. Langeveld, and K. Tanja-Dijkstra, “Stress-reducing effects of real and artificial nature in a hospital waiting room,” J. Altern. Complement. Med., vol. 18, no. 4, 2012, doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0488.
[22] M. Heikkilä, I. Verma, and S. Nenonen, “Toward Restorative Hospital Environment: Nature and Art in Finnish Hospitals,” HERD Health Environ. Res. Des. J., p. 19375867241239320, 2024.
[23] L. Sharam, K. Mayer, and O. Baumann, “Design by nature: The influence of windows on cognitive performance and affect,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 85, p. 101923, 2023.
[24] H. Alamirah, M. Schweiker, and E. Azar, “Immersive virtual environments for occupant comfort and adaptive behavior research–A comprehensive review of tools and applications,” Build. Environ., vol. 207, p. 108396, 2022.
[25] M. V. Villarejo, B. G. Zapirain, and A. M. Zorrilla, “A Stress Sensor Based on Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) Controlled by ZigBee,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 5, Art. no. 5, 2012, doi: 10.3390/s120506075.
[26] C. Chokwitthaya, S. Saeidi, Y. Zhu, and R. Kooima, “The impact of lighting simulation discrepancies on human visual perception and energy behavior simulations in immersive virtual environment,” presented at the Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering, Proceedings, 2017.
[27] L. Heschong, “Daylight and retail sales,” Heschong Mahone Group Calif. Energy Comm. Fair Oaks, 2003.
[28] F. Rodriguez, V. Garcia-Hansen, A. Allan, and G. Isoardi, “Subjective responses toward daylight changes in window views: Assessing dynamic environmental attributes in an immersive experiment,” Build. Environ., vol. 195, p. 107720, 2021.
[29] S. Ergan, Z. Shi, and X. Yu, “Towards quantifying human experience in the built environment: A crowdsourcing based experiment to identify influential architectural design features,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 20, pp. 51–59, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.07.004.
[30] O. Vartanian et al., “Architectural design and the brain: Effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 41, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.006.
[31] M. Janssen, H. Van Der Voort, and A. Wahyudi, “Factors influencing big data decision-making quality,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 70, pp. 338–345, 2017. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 403 PDF Download: 325 |
||
