Early Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery versus Standard Median Sternotomy Technique | ||||
| The Medical Journal of Cairo University | ||||
| Volume 93, Issue 03, March 2025, Page 419-430 PDF (638.74 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjcu.2025.423598 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| HASSAN A. MOUSTAFA, M.Sc.*; MOSTAFA A. ABD EL-GAWAD, M.D.*; HOSSAM EL-DIN A. ABD EL-HAMID, M.D.*; RAMY M.R. KHORSHID, M.D.* and; ASHRAF M.I. BASSIONY, M.D.** . | ||||
| The Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University* and Military Academy** | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background: Mitral Valve Surgery (MVS) performed through a Standard Median Sternotomy can be particularly technically challenging and is known to carry a potential risk of injuries to patent coronary artery bypass grafts and vascular structures that lie directly substernally and can adhere to the sternum. Postoperative complications after cardiac surgery, particu-larly when occurring in combination, have a profound impact on long-term early, survival and postoperative deaths. Aim of Study: To evaluate the early outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery versus standard median sternoto-my technique in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. Patients and Methods: A retrospective comparative study that is conducted on cases candidate minimally invasive mitral valve surgery versus standard median sternotomy technique. Results: This study was conducted on 40 patients; 18 of them (45%) having isolated mitral valve disease, 22 (55%) hav-ing mitral plus tricuspid valve disease. All the patients com-pleted the study. There was no mortality among the patients. The patients were classified into 2 groups: - Group A: minimally invasive group. This group includes 20 patients requiring mitral valve surgery, and was approached through right anterolateral minithoracotomy. - Group B: Sternotomy group. This group includes 20 patients requiring mitral valve surgery, and was approached through conventional median sternotomy. Conclusion: According to the findings in the current study, minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is a safe procedure, as-sociated with a low incidence of intraoperative complications and excellent postoperative outcomes. However, the cost-ef-fectiveness remains controversial. Therefore, additional multi-center studies are needed to make econometric analysis for any future evaluation of novel cardiovascular therapies. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Mitral Valve Surgery; Minimally Invasive; Stand-ard Median Sternotomy Technique | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 100 PDF Download: 66 |
||||
