Clinical and Technical Predictors of No-reflow during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction | ||||
| Zagazig University Medical Journal | ||||
| Volume 31, Issue 7, July 2025, Page 2824-2831 PDF (1.02 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2025.376706.3913 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Mohamed Salah Abdelbasit 1; Mahmoud Abdelaziz2; Ahmad Aatif Hasan Saqr3; Mohamed Samy  4
| ||||
| 1Cardiology Department, Zagazig university | ||||
| 2Cardiology Department, Zagazig University, Sharkia, Egypt | ||||
| 3Cardiology Department, Alsalam Hospital, Port Said, Egypt | ||||
| 4Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Abstract Background: No-reflow is a major problem during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), which is linked to poor myocardial reperfusion and unfavorable outcomes. Unmasking predictors of no-reflow could guide preventive strategies and enhance patient prognosis. We aimed to assess the no-reflow phenomenon's angiographic, clinical and procedural predictors in STEMI patients receiving primary PCI. Methods: 66 STEMI patients who received primary PCI at Zagazig University Hospitals between November 2022 and May 2023 were included in this cross-sectional analysis. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether no-reflow occurred during PCI. Angiographic information, baseline clinical features, and procedure specifics were documented. Binary logistic regression analysis was used in the statistical study to determine the independent predictors of no-reflow. Results: No-reflow occurred in 30.3% (n=20) of patients. Baseline troponin levels were higher in the no-reflow group (684.8±181.6 ng/L vs. 531±196.1 ng/L, p=0.004). The absence of pre-stenting TIMI 3 flow (40% vs. 80.4%, p=0.001), greater number of stents (1.5±0.6 vs. 1.1±0.3, p=0.012) and more frequent use of non-compliant (NC) balloons (80% vs. 23.9%, p<0.001) were more associated with no-reflow. The use of NC balloons was the most robust independent predictor (OR 9.91; 95% CI: 1.90–51.84; p=0.007), followed by pre-stenting absent TIMI 3 flow (OR 0.149; 95% CI: 0.030–0.731; p=0.019). Conclusion: NC balloons’ use and lack of TIMI 3 flow before stenting are independent predictors of no-reflow during primary PCI. Careful procedural planning and early risk identification are essential to minimize this complication and optimize reperfusion outcomes. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| STEMI; primary PCI; no-reflow; TIMI flow; NC balloon | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 8,192 PDF Download: 62 |
||||
