Effect of Simulated Toothbrushing on Surface Roughness of Different Resin Composite Materials: In Vitro Study. | ||||
| Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science | ||||
| Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2025, Page 213-221 PDF (984.71 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2023.222996.1440 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Hazem Abd el moaty Hasan  1; Radwa Ibrahim El-toukhy2; Nadia Mohamed Zaghloul3
| ||||
| 1Conservative dentistry department, Faculty of dentistry, Mansoura university, Mansoura, Egypt | ||||
| 2Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, gypt | ||||
| 3Conservative dentistry department, faculty of dentistry, mansoura university, mansoura, egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Objective: To evaluate the variations in surface roughness of three nano-scale resin composites (injectable universal nano-fill, universal nano-fill, universal nano-hybrid) prior to and following a simulation of toothbrushing. Materials and methods: 30-disc shaped (10 × 2 mm) samples were fabricated from three different resin composites and grouped into three groups based on the kind of resin composite (n=10): 2 nanofilled composites (G-aenial universal injectable and Filtek Z350 XT) and one nanohybrid composite (Tetric N-ceram). Each specimen was subjected to a toothbrushing simulator for 30 and 60-minute which represented 6 months and 1 year of daily clinical tooth brushing respectively. Surface roughness (Ra) was assessed prior (baseline) and following 30, 60-minute of simulated toothbrushing by profilometer device. Analysis of data was done utilizing the Two-way ANOVA test and post-hoc test for pairwise comparison. Results: After toothbrushing the surface roughness increased significantly in all tested materials. The Ra was statistically higher in the nanohybrid composite than in the two nanofilled composites. However, the two nanofilled composites recorded non-significant differences. The injectable universal nano-fill group showed the lowest mean value of surface roughness, while the highest value was recorded for the nano-hybrid group prior to and following the tooth brushing. Conclusions: Surface roughness after simulated toothbrushing was material and time-dependent. Nanofilled resin composites may be more suitable for dental aesthetic restorations that require long-term maintenance of smoothness. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Surface roughness; Simulated toothbrushing; Nanofilled composite; Nanohybrid composite | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 119 PDF Download: 114 |
||||
